Newsbreak
Guest Column
Virginia Appeals Court to hear challenge to state’s abortion ballot measure
Liberty Counsel
·Spotlight Articles
Kentucky Supreme Court hears arguments in case challenging pro-life state law
The Kentucky Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a case challenging the state’s law protecting nearly all preborn children from abortion. The arguments will determine if the law can stand while the lawsuit, which challenges its constitutionality, plays out in court.
The state’s trigger law, which protects nearly all preborn children from abortion, went into effect following the Supreme Court’s overturn of Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. It was immediately challenged by the abortion industry in the case Cameron v. EMW Surgical Center. While the law was initially blocked, an August appeals court ruling
The argument, as in many states, seems to hinge on the nebulous “right to privacy” in state constitutions, used by abortion activist groups to promote the alleged “right” to kill a human being in the womb.
“We believe within that right to privacy and the right to self-determination, to determine what’s best for your own future and your own body is also the right to access abortion,” ACLU of Kentucky Communications Manager, Samuel Crankshaw told WKYT. In other words, abortion is not an enumerated “right” in the state; abortion groups just want the law to be interpreted to include it as such.
While the state legislature has passed the law ensuring protections for the preborn, Kentucky voters recently rejected Amendment 2, which would have ensured that abortion is not a right in the state constitution. Had it passed, the ambiguous “privacy” interpretation would be moot.
Kentucky Right to Life Executive Director Addia Wuchner told WKYT that she hopes the court retains its focus on the current Kentucky constitution.
“From the judicial side of it, the justices should be ruling on the Constitutionality. Not on what’s popular,” she said. “We’re there because we have stated from the very beginning, there’s not a right, an explicit right, to an abortion as the constitution stands right now. And that’s what the Attorney General was also defending.”
Attorney General Daniel Cameron put out a statement following Tuesday’s hearing.
“It is the responsibility of this office to defend the laws passed by the General Assembly,” he wrote. “Today we did so by defending Kentucky’s Human Life Protection Act and the Heartbeat Law in the Kentucky Supreme Court. We have asked the court to allow these pro-life laws to stand and to recognize that policy-making authority belongs to the General Assembly, not the judiciary.”
According to the Washington Post, legal experts expect the court to hand down its decision in one to three weeks.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Kentucky Supreme Court hears arguments in case challenging pro-life state law
The Kentucky Supreme Court heard arguments Tuesday in a case challenging the state’s law protecting nearly all preborn children from abortion. The arguments will determine if the law can stand while the lawsuit, which challenges its constitutionality, plays out in court.
The state’s trigger law, which protects nearly all preborn children from abortion, went into effect following the Supreme Court’s overturn of Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization. It was immediately challenged by the abortion industry in the case Cameron v. EMW Surgical Center. While the law was initially blocked, an August appeals court ruling allowed the law to stand, halting most abortions in the state. Following Tuesday’s hearings, the court will decide whether or not to uphold the appeals court ruling or place an injunction on the law, which would allow abortions to resume.
The argument, as in many states, seems to hinge on the nebulous “right to privacy” in state constitutions, used by abortion activist groups to promote the alleged “right” to kill a human being in the womb.
Guest Column
Liberty Counsel
·
Issues
Nancy Flanders
·
Pop Culture
Nancy Flanders
·
Pop Culture
Bridget Sielicki
·
Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·Pop Culture
Bridget Sielicki
·Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·
Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·
Pop Culture
Bridget Sielicki
·
Human Interest
Bridget Sielicki
·“We believe within that right to privacy and the right to self-determination, to determine what’s best for your own future and your own body is also the right to access abortion,” ACLU of Kentucky Communications Manager, Samuel Crankshaw told WKYT. In other words, abortion is not an enumerated “right” in the state; abortion groups just want the law to be interpreted to include it as such.
While the state legislature has passed the law ensuring protections for the preborn, Kentucky voters recently rejected Amendment 2, which would have ensured that abortion is not a right in the state constitution. Had it passed, the ambiguous “privacy” interpretation would be moot.
Kentucky Right to Life Executive Director Addia Wuchner told WKYT that she hopes the court retains its focus on the current Kentucky constitution.
“From the judicial side of it, the justices should be ruling on the Constitutionality. Not on what’s popular,” she said. “We’re there because we have stated from the very beginning, there’s not a right, an explicit right, to an abortion as the constitution stands right now. And that’s what the Attorney General was also defending.”
Attorney General Daniel Cameron put out a statement following Tuesday’s hearing.
“It is the responsibility of this office to defend the laws passed by the General Assembly,” he wrote. “Today we did so by defending Kentucky’s Human Life Protection Act and the Heartbeat Law in the Kentucky Supreme Court. We have asked the court to allow these pro-life laws to stand and to recognize that policy-making authority belongs to the General Assembly, not the judiciary.”
According to the Washington Post, legal experts expect the court to hand down its decision in one to three weeks.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Nancy Flanders
·Bridget Sielicki
·My statement regarding our defense of Kentucky's Human Life Protection Act before the Supreme Court of Kentucky:
My statement regarding our defense of Kentucky's Human Life Protection Act before the Supreme Court of Kentucky:
