Skip to main content
Live Action LogoLive Action
court, utah, abortion pill reversal, Illinois, conscience protections, abortions, iowa, college

Federal judge blocks Obama-era mandate removing pro-life conscience protections

IssuesIssues·By Laura Nicole

Federal judge blocks Obama-era mandate removing pro-life conscience protections

In a major victory for pro-life health care providers, a federal court has blocked a mandate requiring physicians to participate in abortions as instructed by their employers or face steep penalties. The Obama-era mandate was previously blocked by courts but the Biden-Harris administration attempted to resurrect it. 

On August 9th, Judge Reed O’Connor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas granted a permanent injunction to the “Christian Plaintiffs,” described as a Catholic hospital and Christian health care association, who sued against the mandate on the grounds that it violated their conscience protections in the case of Franciscan Alliance, Inc. et al. v. Xavier Becerra.

Judge Reed’s ruling found that the Department of Health and Human Services’ mandate would cause “irreparable harm” to religious liberty protections, as defined by the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993. Although the rule had already been blocked by previous legal action and court injunctions and then reinterpreted by the Trump administration, the Biden administration had sought to reinvigorate the Obama-era pro-abortion interpretation and enforce it with fines and other administrative actions.

“Here, Christian Plaintiffs contend that violation of their statutory rights under RFRA is an irreparable harm,” the ruling states. “The Court agrees and concludes that enforcement of the 2021 Interpretation forces Christian Plaintiffs to face civil penalties or to perform gender-transition procedures and abortions contrary to their religious beliefs—a quintessential irreparable injury.” 

The ruling means that Health and Human Services Secretary pro-abortion Xavier Becerra will be prohibited “from interpreting or enforcing” the law “in a manner that would require them to perform or provide insurance coverage for gender-transition procedures or abortions, including by denying Federal financial assistance because of their failure to perform or provide insurance coverage for such procedures or by otherwise pursuing, charging, or assessing any penalties, fines, assessments, investigations, or other enforcement actions.”

READ: Spain plans to expand its abortion laws, end conscience protections for doctors

Article continues below

Dear Reader,

In 2026, Live Action is heading straight where the battle is fiercest: college campuses.

We have a bold initiative to establish 100 Live Action campus chapters within the next year, and your partnership will make it a success!

Your support today will help train and equip young leaders, bring Live Action’s educational content into academic environments, host on-campus events and debates, and empower students to challenge the pro-abortion status quo with truth and compassion.

Invest in pro-life grassroots outreach and cultural formation with your DOUBLED year-end gift!

Luke Goodrich, vice president and senior counsel at the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, celebrated the ruling on Twitter. “Today’s ruling protects patients, aligns with current medical research, and ensures doctors aren’t forced to violate their religious beliefs and medical judgment — a victory for common sense, conscience, and sound medicine,” he said.

The Obama administration originally issued the mandate in 2016, based on an Affordable Care Act nondiscrimination clause, according to the Daily Caller, which required health care providers to commit abortions and perform gender-transition surgeries. The Obama and Biden administrations have interpreted this rule as a way to deny a pro-life doctor’s right to refrain from committing a “termination of pregnancy” on a pregnant woman — essentially claiming that not committing an abortion is a form of sex discrimination. 

A North Dakota Eastern Division court struck down the mandate earlier this year, making this more recent court ruling the second to block the mandate this year. The Biden administration has appealed the North Dakota ruling, according to the Daily Caller, pitting Becerra against the Sisters of Mercy for a second time. 

The latest ruling comes as conscience protections increasingly have been under attack around the world. The European Parliament recently labeled abortion a fundamental human right and called for member countries to decriminalize abortion and remove physician’s conscience protections.

“Like” Live Action News on Facebook for more pro-life news and commentary!

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextClose-up of anonymous police officer wearing stab proof vest uniform and gear worn by constablury at the scene of an event. They are in front of emergency services police force vehicles featuring a cop car and police van, in response to an incident. Officers provide law enforcement, establish public order and protect citizens.
Activism

UK free speech concerns mount as another pro-lifer is briefly arrested

Angeline Tan

·

Spotlight Articles