
Texas women blame pro-life law for delayed ectopic pregnancy treatment. But is it at fault?
Nancy Flanders
·We are urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly supporters) before the end of October to help save babies from abortion 365 days a year. Your first gift as a Life Defender today will be DOUBLED. Click here to make your monthly commitment.
Guest Column·By Michael J. New
Polling reveals Roe v. Wade abortion policy is less popular than media portrays
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this guest post are solely those of the author and are not necessarily reflective of Live Action or Live Action News.
Whenever pro-lifers achieve a significant legislative or political victory, mainstream media outlets are typically quick to promote polls and surveys which purportedly show low levels of support for the pro-life position. The recent enforcement of legislation Texas which legally protects unborn children after a heartbeat can be detected proved to be no exception. Recently, multiple media outlets, including The Washington Post, The Hill and MSNBC.com cited a new NBC News poll which purportedly shows that a majority of Americans think that abortion should be a legal option in “all” or “most” cases.
However, the problem with this NBC News poll poll is that it fails to specifically ask about the Texas heartbeat bill. When surveys ask about this specific piece of pro-life legislation, a much different picture emerges.
Indeed, a Rasmussen poll of likely U.S. voters that was released this week found 46 percent of likely U.S. voters supported the Texas law with 43 percent opposed. The demographic breakdown of this poll was fairly consistent with other recent abortion surveys. Men were somewhat more likely to support the Texas law than women. Also, the law enjoyed somewhat more support from older voters than younger voters. That said, the fact that the Texas heartbeat bill received plurality support is good news for pro-lifers.
READ: These 7 abortion-related cases are set to be heard by the Supreme Court this fall
Dear Reader,
Every day in America, more than 2,800 preborn babies lose their lives to abortion.
That number should break our hearts and move us to action.
Ending this tragedy requires daily commitment from people like you who refuse to stay silent.
Millions read Live Action News each month — imagine the impact if each of us took a stand for life 365 days a year.
Right now, we’re urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly donors) to join us before the end of October. And thanks to a generous $250,000 matching grant, your first monthly gift will be DOUBLED to help save lives and build a culture that protects the preborn.
Will you become one of the 500 today? Click here now to become a Live Action Life Defender and have your first gift doubled.
Together, we can end abortion and create a future where every child is cherished and every mother is supported.
This recent Rasmussen poll also asked another question that should be of specific interest to pro-lifers. The survey asked if “abortion laws should be determined by the state governments or the federal government. Interestingly, by a 46 to 34 margin, a plurality of likely voters said that abortion laws should be determined by state governments. Furthermore, state government control of abortion policy received plurality support from a very wide range of demographic groups including men, women, white respondents, Black respondents, and all age groups.
This very nicely shows that the abortion policy regime ushered in by the Roe v. Wade decision is less popular than many believe.
Overall, pro-life heartbeat bills have more public support the mainstream media is willing to admit. A recent Saint Louis University/YouGov poll shows that 56 percent of likely Missouri voters believe abortions should be prohibited after eight weeks gestation. Similarly, two separate polls conducted in 2019 and 2021 both show that a plurality of Texas voters support pro-life heartbeat bills. Overall, the Texas heartbeat bill has received no shortage of negative coverage from the mainstream media. However, pro-lifers should not be discouraged. A substantial body of research shows that legislation that protects preborn children often enjoys strong political and public support. As always, pro-lifers would do well to stay the course.
Michael J. New is a Research Associate at The Busch School of Business and an Associate Scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute. Follow him on Twitter @Michael_J_New
“Like” Live Action News on Facebook for more pro-life news and commentary!
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Nancy Flanders
·Guest Column
Right to Life UK
·Guest Column
Hector O. Chapa, M.D.
·Guest Column
Stefano Gennarini, J.D.
·Guest Column
Right to Life UK
·Guest Column
Hector O. Chapa, M.D.
·Guest Column
Michael J. New
·Guest Column
Michael J. New
·Guest Column
Michael J. New
·Guest Column
Michael J. New
·Guest Column
Michael J. New
·