Skip to main content

We are urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly supporters) before the end of October to help save babies from abortion 365 days a year. Your first gift as a Life Defender today will be DOUBLED. Click here to make your monthly commitment.

Live Action LogoLive Action
WASHINGTON, DC - OCTOBER 1: Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) walks out of the Senate Chamber of the U.S. Capitol Building on October 1, 2025 in Washington, DC. The government shut down early Wednesday after Congress failed to reach a funding deal.
Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

New bill would ban taxpayer funding for minors to get abortions

PoliticsPolitics·By Cassy Cooke

New bill would ban taxpayer funding for minors to get abortions

Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has introduced a bill banning health care exchanges from including coverage of abortion or "gender-transition procedures" for minors.

Key Takeaways:

  • Hawley introduced the the Prohibiting Abortion & Transgender Procedures on the Exchanges Act on October 15th.

  • The bill would ban health care exchanges from including any coverage of abortion or "gender-transition procedures" for minors.

  • Additionally, it would place language from the Hyde Amendment directly into the federal coverage terms of health plans.

  • This would ban Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchanges from providing any coverage for abortion, except in cases of rape or incest, or if the mother’s life is at risk. 

The Details:

Hawley announced the new legislation in a press release, saying the bill would completely ban coverage of abortion and transgender services for minors.

Furthermore, it would ban exchanges from providing any coverage for a minor's abortion, except in cases of rape, incest, or if the mother's life is at risk.

“It’s time to ban abortion and gender-transition procedures for minors on the healthcare exchanges," he said. "No more loopholes."

The "gender-transition procedures" mentioned in the bill include so-called puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and elective transgender-related surgeries.

The Hyde Amendment bars any federal funding from being used on abortion, but many ACA exchanges still include abortion coverage, often through state-level loopholes. Hawley's bill aims to close these loopholes, and ensure abortion does not receive any federal funding.

Dear Reader,

Every day in America, more than 2,800 preborn babies lose their lives to abortion.

That number should break our hearts and move us to action.

Ending this tragedy requires daily commitment from people like you who refuse to stay silent.

Millions read Live Action News each month — imagine the impact if each of us took a stand for life 365 days a year.

Right now, we’re urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly donors) to join us before the end of October. And thanks to a generous $250,000 matching grant, your first monthly gift will be DOUBLED to help save lives and build a culture that protects the preborn.

Will you become one of the 500 today? Click here now to become a Live Action Life Defender and have your first gift doubled.

Together, we can end abortion and create a future where every child is cherished and every mother is supported.

Jamie Dangers, director of federal affairs at Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, applauded the bill.

This bill would do what should have been done 15 years ago by applying the Hyde Amendment to Obamacare so that health care plans don’t pay for elective abortions with taxpayer dollars.

Until a bill like this becomes law, however, Republicans must make Hyde protections nonnegotiable in any funding for Obamacare, which currently uses taxpayer dollars to fund abortion on demand.

Thumbnail for Do Taxes Pay for Abortions?

Why It Matters:

The Hyde Amendment is a pro-life rider created in 1976 included in every appropriations act since then; it prevents federal dollars from funding most abortions in the United States, and has been credited with saving millions of lives from abortion.

Under the Biden administration, taxpayer funding for abortion was expanded under an executive order. This included waivers, and ruling that transportation or ancillary services related to abortion — meaning things like travel related to abortion without paying for the abortion itself — did not violate Hyde. The Trump administration has since rescinded that order, saying it would be putting a stop to such abuses:

[F]or nearly five decades, Congress has enacted the Hyde Amendment and a series of additional laws to protect taxpayers from being forced to pay for abortion. Contrary to this longstanding commonsense policy, the previous administration embedded federal funding of elective abortion in a wide variety of government programs.

Yet while Hyde prevents federal tax dollars from funding abortions, state funds can be used however those legislators choose, meaning taxpayer-funded abortion on the state level is legal, and has been increasing in recent years.

The Bottom Line:

It is long past time for Americans to stop being forced to fund minors' abortions and transgender procedures they don't support. Loopholes allowing for Hyde to be abused need to end.

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextWomen protests against Costa Rica's president, Carlos Alvarado, politics on abortion in San Jose, Costa Rica, on October 17, 2019. - Carlos Alvarado, President of Costa Rica, made a commitment to pass a regulation that will guarantee access to therapeutical abortion to those women whose health or life are at risk. A group of evangelical legislators and the Catholic Church of Costa Rica have been protesting against this decision and are pressing the president to not sign the regulation, as they consider it will open the door to abortion under any circumstance.
International

Costa Rica expands pro-life protections for preborn babies

Bridget Bosco

·

Spotlight Articles