
Assisted death advocates hope to end faith-based hospital exemptions in BC
Angeline Tan
·
Guest Column·By Stefano Gennarini, J.D.
Close vote gives 'wake up call' to UN member countries promoting abortion
(United Nations, C-Fam) More governments than ever voted for eliminating controversial language related to abortion and LGBT issues in the ongoing UN General Assembly.
In the Third Committee of the General Assembly, forty-eight governments voted in favor of removing “sexual and reproductive health” language from a resolution on children. Seventy governments voted to remove “sexual orientation and gender identity” from a resolution on persons with disabilities.
In both cases the amendments to remove the controversial terms failed, but the votes were closer than it was imagined possible. While seventy-four governments voted to retain the language on sexual orientation, they won by a mere four votes. Many of the governments that voted in favor of the homosexual and transgender agenda did so only because of pressure from the European Union. Over fifty states abstained or failed to cast a vote.
The close vote is a wakeup call for the European Union and progressive governments that promote abortion and gender ideology in UN policy. The vote demonstrated a realistic path to rollback abortion and gender ideology from UN policy altogether, something few thought possible during the first Trump administration.
Dozens of delegations made statements complaining of the attempt to corrupt children through explicit UN-style sex education and the promotion of abortion and contraception for children without parental consent.
Speaking on behalf of a group of African governments, Nigeria complained that proposals related to the importance of the family were not included in the final draft, despite being based on the obligations of all members states under binding international treaties.
A delegate from Burkina Faso —speaking for Burundi, Cameroon, and Mali — said the use of the term sexual and reproductive health “cannot be interpreted as giving children access to drugs and medical treatment without parental consent.” ...
Editor's Note: Stefano Gennarini, J.D. writes for C-Fam. This article first appeared in the Friday Fax, an internet report published weekly by C-Fam (Center for Family & Human Rights), a New York and Washington DC-based research institute (https://c-fam.org/). This article appears with permission.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Angeline Tan
·
Guest Column
Mark Lee Dickson
·
Guest Column
Michael J. New
·
Guest Column
Melina Nicole
·
Guest Column
Wesley J. Smith
·
Politics
Rebecca Oas, Ph.D.
·
Guest Column
Stefano Gennarini, J.D.
·
Politics
Stefano Gennarini, J.D.
·
Guest Column
Stefano Gennarini, J.D.
·
Guest Column
Stefano Gennarini, J.D.
·
Guest Column
Stefano Gennarini, J.D.
·