Skip to main content

We are urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly supporters) before the end of October to help save babies from abortion 365 days a year. Your first gift as a Life Defender today will be DOUBLED. Click here to make your monthly commitment.

Live Action LogoLive Action
Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade, pregnancy centers, pregnancy resource centers, Supreme Court, Arkansas, Planned Parenthood

Supreme Court sets a date to hear potential challenge to Roe v. Wade

Icon of a megaphoneNewsbreak·By Cassy Cooke

Supreme Court sets a date to hear potential challenge to Roe v. Wade

Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization will be heard by the Supreme Court on December 1, in a case that could lead to the overturning of Roe v. Wade. The Mississippi law could also affect Planned Parenthood v. Casey, the 1992 Supreme Court case in which the court agreed with Roe that abortion is a constitutional right, but only through viability.

The Gestational Age Act was passed in Mississippi in 2018, and restricts abortions after 15 weeks (approximately four months), unless there is a medical emergency or a severe fetal abnormality. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the only abortion business in the state, filed a lawsuit, and the law was struck down twice by federal courts.

Earlier this year, the Supreme Court announced they would hear the case, and not long after, Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch filed a brief seeking an answer to whether all pre-viability prohibitions on abortions are unconstitutional.

“A lot has changed in the five decades since Roe, yet it shackles states to an outdated view of facts and prevents them from protecting legitimate interests in the context of current science and culture,” Fitch told Live Action News. “In my brief, I ask the Court to set things right and return abortion policy to the political branches where debate can flourish and the will of the people can be discerned at the ballot box.”

READ: 18 state AGs ask Supreme Court to uphold Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban

Though many abortion activists have claimed that the law attacks women, it will actually help protect women from dangerous abortion businesses, like Jackson Women’s Health Organization.

Dear Reader,

Every day in America, more than 2,800 preborn babies lose their lives to abortion.

That number should break our hearts and move us to action.

Ending this tragedy requires daily commitment from people like you who refuse to stay silent.

Millions read Live Action News each month — imagine the impact if each of us took a stand for life 365 days a year.

Right now, we’re urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly donors) to join us before the end of October. And thanks to a generous $250,000 matching grant, your first monthly gift will be DOUBLED to help save lives and build a culture that protects the preborn.

Will you become one of the 500 today? Click here now to become a Live Action Life Defender and have your first gift doubled.

Together, we can end abortion and create a future where every child is cherished and every mother is supported.

Diane Derzis, the owner of the abortion facility, has a horrifying background in Birmingham, Alabama. There, the facility she owned sent three women to the hospital on the same day, and her facility was found to have 76 pages worth of violations. Derzis seems to have continued to employ the same abortionist responsible for the injuries in Alabama — Bruce Eliot Norman — at Jackson Women’s Health Organization in Mississippi. The business model in Alabama was so dangerous that Derzis was forced to sell, and ordered not to have any affiliation with the Alabama facility. It appears that little has changed with how Derzis conducts business.

As the original law points out, abortion risks increase as pregnancy progresses, with complications including infection, blood clots, hemorrhage, and perforation of the cervix, uterus, bowel, or bladder. The bill explains that after 15 weeks, “there is a higher risk of requiring a hysterectomy, other reparative surgery, or blood transfusion.”

Governors from multiple other states filed an amicus brief in August showing their support for the law.

“The Court should take this opportunity to correct the mistakes in its abortion jurisprudence and recognize that the text and original understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment have nothing to do with abortion,” the brief read. “Rather than creating a federal constitutional right, the Court should leave regulating abortion to the States, where the people may act through the democratic process.”

“Like” Live Action News on Facebook for more pro-life news and commentary!

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextPHILADELPHIA, PA - SEPTEMBER 13: Dr. Arthur Caplan takes part in a panel discussion prior to the 2012 Liberty Medal Ceremony at the National Constitution Center on September 13, 2012 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Human Rights

Bioethicist slams women's rights groups for condemning surrogacy

Cassy Cooke

·

Spotlight Articles