Epic action from @ShoutYrAbortion — people took abortion pills outside the Supreme Court!

Pro-abortion protesters swallow alleged abortion pills in front of Supreme Court
Abortion Pill·By Nancy Flanders
Pro-abortion protesters swallow alleged abortion pills in front of Supreme Court
Following chants of “Abortion pills forever,” four pro-abortion women appeared to swallow pills they claimed were the abortion pill regimen — which actually includes a second drug taken up to 48 hours later — while outside the Supreme Court ahead of oral arguments in the court’s first big abortion case in years. Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization centers on the Gestational Age Act of Mississippi, which restricted abortion to the first 15 weeks of pregnancy.
The women smiled as they swallowed the pills, which cannot be verified to be the actual drug mifepristone. Behind them, two other women held a banner reading, “We are taking abortion pills forever.” All six women were dressed in black and those who took the pills removed them from boxes with bold type reading “Abortion pills.” This, of course, was not legitimate abortion pill packaging and simply added to the theater of the moment.
READ: Legal experts say viability rule in abortion law was a political decision, not a science-based one
Video of the demonstration was posted to Twitter by Erin Matson of the pro-abortion group ReproAction, who wrote, “Epic action from @ShoutYrAbortion — people took abortion pills outside the Supreme Court!” Shout Your Abortion encourages women on its website to order abortion pills ahead of time in case they become pregnant, along with the disclaimer that doing so “may carry legal risk.”
The abortion pill carries serious potential risks, including hemorrhaging, incomplete abortion, infection, and death. While the abortion industry promotes the abortion pill as safe and as simple as taking Tylenol, it has actually been found to be four times more dangerous for women than first-trimester surgical abortion.
If the Supreme Court rules that the Mississippi law can stand, it will open the door for other states to restrict abortion to before the arbitrary age of “viability.” The 1973 Supreme Court ruling Roe v. Wade and the 1992 Supreme Court ruling of Planned Parenthood v. Casey determined and reaffirmed that states had a “compelling interest” in protecting human life only after about 24 weeks of pregnancy. However, viability is a subjective term.
Every human being is viable in their natural environment, because they are in the process of living. Forcing death upon a preborn child through abortion is the direct cause of making that child non-viable. States have an interest in protecting human life at all stages of development.
Editor’s Note: This article has been modified since original publication.
“Like” Live Action News on Facebook for more pro-life news and commentary!
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Read Next

Northern Ireland pro-lifer seeks judge's recusal in buffer zone prayer case
Bridget Sielicki
·More In Abortion Pill

Abortion Pill
Researcher who tried to discredit 'abortion pill reversal' gets lifetime achievement award
Cassy Cooke
·
Abortion Pill
California lawmakers pass bill to hide all information on abortion pill prescriptions
Bridget Sielicki
·
Abortion Pill
Houston midwife accused of illegal abortions faces 15 felony charges
Bridget Sielicki
·
Abortion Pill
Ironic twist: Abortion industry wants transparency regarding abortion pill review
Carole Novielli
·
Abortion Pill
Man files countersuit against woman who says he drugged her with abortion pills
Nancy Flanders
·More From Nancy Flanders

Analysis
Rose v. Kissling debate at Yale: A conflict between dignity and discrimination
Nancy Flanders
·
Human Rights
Live Action's Lila Rose wins Yale debate against former 'Catholics for Choice' president
Nancy Flanders
·
Human Interest
'Fullness of life': Born missing nearly all of his brain, Tomek is thriving today
Nancy Flanders
·
Pop Culture
J.K. Rowling: 'I used to believe in assisted dying. I no longer do.'
Nancy Flanders
·
International
Queensland Supreme Court lets 12-year-old get abortion despite inability to consent
Nancy Flanders
·