However, in a statement regarding the heartbeat bill veto, which took place December 21, Kasich explained that he thought the bill was “contrary to the Supreme Court of the United States’ current rulings on abortion.” It is because of this that he envisioned a lawsuit against Ohio during which the law would be “struck down as unconstitutional” and the state would then have to pay “hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to cover the legal fees for the pro-choice activists’ lawyers.” He felt that the veto was in the interest of the people of Ohio.

READ: The science is clear: At 22 days, a baby’s heart begins to beat

For Kasich to assume that a court, with a changing landscape of judges, would automatically kill legislation is unfounded, as the current court has not yet had to rule on such decisions since the seating of Judge Neil Gorsuch and Judge Brett Kavanaugh, and perhaps others by the time a case like this could reach the court.

Abortion advocates cried for fear during the Kavanaugh hearings, declaring that Roe v. Wade was going to be overturned. While that was far-fetched based on a single judge being seated, the fear of the abortion industry is likely based on cases like the heartbeat bill reaching the high court, which would then have to review the Roe v. Wade decision in light of technological advances. Kasich’s veto today has ensured that this case won’t be the one by which that happens.

READ: The science is clear: At 22 days, a baby’s heart begins to beat

For Kasich to assume that a court, with a changing landscape of judges, would automatically kill legislation is unfounded, as the current court has not yet had to rule on such decisions since the seating of Judge Neil Gorsuch and Judge Brett Kavanaugh, and perhaps others by the time a case like this could reach the court.

Abortion advocates cried for fear during the Kavanaugh hearings, declaring that Roe v. Wade was going to be overturned. While that was far-fetched based on a single judge being seated, the fear of the abortion industry is likely based on cases like the heartbeat bill reaching the high court, which would then have to review the Roe v. Wade decision in light of technological advances. Kasich’s veto today has ensured that this case won’t be the one by which that happens.