
Why more regulation won't solve the ethical IVF crisis
Angeline Tan
·
New York county suddenly reconsiders abortion facility buffer zone law
Westchester County in New York is now said to be reconsidering a buffer zone surrounding abortion businesses as the U.S. Supreme Court prepares to hear the case challenging the constiutionality of the law.
The Westchester County Board of Legislators held a meeting to decided whether or not to amend the “Clinic Access Law,” which created a 100-foot buffer zone around abortion businesses. The law was passed last year and aims to prevent pro-life sidewalk counselors from reaching women who may want to consider options other than abortion. Because of the law, pro-life sidewalk counselors would not be allowed within eight feet of a woman in the buffer zone.
According to the Washington Examiner, the Westchester County Board of Legislators is considering an amendment to the law that would remove the eight-foot provision because it may prove to be unnecessary and “difficult to enforce.” The buffer zone, however, would remain as is. While the Supreme Court upheld a similar law in Colorado in 2000 in Hill v. Colorado, the court looks different today than it did 23 years ago, and the county board doesn’t want to risk losing the case and be the ones to blame for a changed precedent.
Article continues below
Dear Reader,
In 2026, Live Action is heading straight where the battle is fiercest: college campuses.
We have a bold initiative to establish 100 Live Action campus chapters within the next year, and your partnership will make it a success!
Your support today will help train and equip young leaders, bring Live Action’s educational content into academic environments, host on-campus events and debates, and empower students to challenge the pro-abortion status quo with truth and compassion.
Invest in pro-life grassroots outreach and cultural formation with your DOUBLED year-end gift!
Last month, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the law — but Joe Davis, counsel for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a nonprofit group representing the plaintiffs, believes the county board is concerned that the Supreme Court will rule against them and create a new precedent. They don’t want to be the ones behind the case that may overturn a previous abortion-friendly ruling.
“The county is afraid of our lawsuit and afraid of the Supreme Court,” Davis told the Washington Examiner. “They know that this law is about to be struck down and Hill v. Colorado is about to be overruled when this case gets back to the court.”
Davis said that the actions of the county board to reconsider the law is proof that even they know the law is unconstitutional.

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Angeline Tan
·
Guest Column
Mark Lee Dickson
·
Activism
Bridget Sielicki
·
Guest Column
Mark Lee Dickson
·
Guest Column
Mark Lee Dickson
·
Guest Column
Mark Lee Dickson
·
Issues
Nancy Flanders
·
Human Interest
Nancy Flanders
·
Investigative
Nancy Flanders
·
Pop Culture
Nancy Flanders
·
Human Interest
Nancy Flanders
·