Skip to main content
Live Action LogoLive Action
Businesswoman giving presentation by chalkboard at convention center

Professors sue Idaho over law they feel restricts them from promoting abortion in class

Icon of a megaphoneNewsbreak·By Bridget Sielicki

Professors sue Idaho over law they feel restricts them from promoting abortion in class

Six college professors and two teachers’ unions are suing the state of Idaho over a pro-life law that prohibits them from promoting abortion to students in the classroom. The plaintiffs argue that the law violates their First Amendment rights.

Passed in 2021, the state law prevents state funds from being used to “procure, counsel in favor, refer to or perform an abortion.” The plaintiffs, who include five professors at the University of Idaho and one at Boise State University, argue that under the law, they can no longer mention abortion in the classroom. They are represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which says the law places a “strait jacket upon the intellectual leaders” of state universities. They say the law’s wording is unclear and therefore allows authorities to “draw their own lines between permissible and prohibited speech.”

“It’s vital for Idaho’s public universities to have autonomy in fostering vibrant debate on their campuses, free from government interference,” Leo Morales, executive director for the ACLU of Idaho, said in a news release. “However, Idaho’s abortion censorship law directly undermines that autonomy, attempting to restrict educators’ free speech and stoke fear of retaliation for such speech in our state.”

Blaine Conzatti, president of the Idaho Family Policy Center, which helped draft the law, dismissed the lawsuit as a “baseless legal challenge,” noting the law’s primary intent is to keep public universities from offering the abortion pill or referring students for abortions.

“Their meritless lawsuit won’t be successful,” Conzatti said.

“The First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution do not provide carte blanche legal protections for higher education faculty to advocate or engage in criminal behavior on the taxpayer’s dime,” he added. “The ‘No Public Funds For Abortion Act’ simply does not infringe on academic speech protected by the First Amendment, including classroom discussion on the topics related to abortion.”

The lawsuit asks U.S. District Judge David C. Nye to block enforcement of the law with a preliminary injunction.

Pro-abortion Ohio TV ad ‘dangerously misrepresents’ how the Church helps pregnant women image

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextCardinal and Archbishop of Luxembourg, President of the Commission of the Episcopal Conferences of the European Community and Vice-President of the Council of Bishops' Conferences of Europe Jean-PierreClaude Hollerich, during the press conference to present the Ecumenical Prayer Vigil and the Together initiative: a meeting of the People of God, on the eve of the XVI Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops on the theme of a Church in solidarity. Vatican City (Vatican), January 23th, 2023.
International

Cardinal objects to Luxembourg 'right' to abortion, but for unusual reasons

Angeline Tan

·

Spotlight Articles