Skip to main content

We are urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly supporters) before the end of October to help save babies from abortion 365 days a year. Your first gift as a Life Defender today will be DOUBLED. Click here to make your monthly commitment.

Live Action LogoLive Action
A scientist checks some laboratory mice used for

HORROR: Hair from the scalps of aborted children grows on the backs of ‘humanized’ mice

IssuesIssues·By Anne Marie Williams, RN, BSN

HORROR: Hair from the scalps of aborted children grows on the backs of ‘humanized’ mice

Earlier this week, Dr. Stacy Trasancos, Ph.D. wrote a piece for the National Catholic Register citing three examples of recent or ongoing federally-funded research studies utilizing tissue from aborted babies. In June, the Department of Health and Human Services announced a halt on federal funding for research projects utilizing aborted fetal tissue, specifically at first at the University of California San-Francisco and, moving forward, at any location. The HHS statement read (emphasis added):

The audit and review helped inform the policy process that led to the administration’s decision to let the contract with UCSF expire and to discontinue intramural research – research conducted within the National Institutes of Health (NIH) – involving the use of human fetal tissue from elective abortion. Intramural research that requires new acquisition of fetal tissue from elective abortions will not be conducted.

Since the HHS decision, 13 funding requests for studies requiring aborted fetal tissue were rejected according to the HHS’ Ethics Advisory Board’s guidelines. Prior to the change, research studies using the body parts of aborted babies were conducted, and Trasancos mentions three published in the last half of 2020.

READ: Taxpayer-funded fetal tissue researchers want their names kept secret

One stomach-churning example came from the University of Pittsburgh, which utilized “full-thickness human skin” obtained from children killed during second-trimester abortions and grafted it onto “humanized” mice. Trasancos wrote, “Human skin protects an individual from infection, but there is no way to study the effects of pathogens on individuals without subjecting them to disease. So, the group used aborted children for that purpose. They made ‘human Skin and Immune System (hSIS)-humanized’ mouse and rat models to study the immune system when the skin is infected with a staph infection.”

Aborted babies were, quite literally, scalped, for purposes of the study. “‘(F)ull-thickness human skin’ was taken from the scalps (skin with hair) and backs (skin without hair) of children aborted at the gestational age of 18 to 20 weeks of pregnancy. The abortions were done at the Magee-Women’s Hospital and specimens were stored at the University of Pittsburgh Health Sciences Tissue Bank.” In a devastatingly ironic twist, the research report was careful to note under its ‘Ethical Approval’ heading, “All animal studies/experimental protocols were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Pittsburgh and were conducted following approved guidelines, which adheres to the NIH guidelines for housing and care of laboratory animals.”

Dear Reader,

Every day in America, more than 2,800 preborn babies lose their lives to abortion.

That number should break our hearts and move us to action.

Ending this tragedy requires daily commitment from people like you who refuse to stay silent.

Millions read Live Action News each month — imagine the impact if each of us took a stand for life 365 days a year.

Right now, we’re urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly donors) to join us before the end of October. And thanks to a generous $250,000 matching grant, your first monthly gift will be DOUBLED to help save lives and build a culture that protects the preborn.

Will you become one of the 500 today? Click here now to become a Live Action Life Defender and have your first gift doubled.

Together, we can end abortion and create a future where every child is cherished and every mother is supported.

Sadly, no such pains were taken in the care of the aborted baby body parts, as “[t]he use of de-identified human fetal tissues did not constitute human subjects research as defined under federal regulations.” (emphasis added)

In addition to their scalps and backs, spleens and lymphatic tissue and other immune system cells were also harvested from the aborted babies so that “when the (hSIS)-humanized rodent models were given a staph infection on the skin, scientists could study how the internal organs responded,” according to Trasancos. Twelve weeks after the grafting and transplantation, as shown below, “The images literally show a patch of baby hair growing on a mouse’s back.”

Experiments using aborted human fetal tissue and animals funded by Fauci’s NIAID image
Photo via the study in Nature

Utilizing tissue from aborted babies for research purposes is reminiscent of the grotesque research experiments performed on young prisoners by the Dr. Josef Mengele, the infamous Nazi “Angel of Death.” While some have falsely claimed that aborted fetal tissue is necessary for COVID-19 vaccines and other life-saving purposes, in reality, using the bodies of aborted babies to somehow benefit the living is disgusting, repulsive, and grotesque.

One commenter to a Facebook post (below) made by Trasancos on Wednesday captured the essence of everything that’s wrong with using aborted fetal tissue to grow baby hair on a mouse’s back. “That hair should smell like milk and baby shampoo and be caressed and kissed by a loving mother. This is heartbreaking,” wrote the commenter.

Recently, post-abortive mother Jess Echeverry testified before the Ohio House of Representatives in favor of a state law requiring the humane disposal of aborted babies. She recalled a conversation with a friend who asked her, “Do you know what truly separates us from animals?” The answer was, “We bury our dead.” Use of aborted fetal tissue in the testing or production of vaccines or for other research purposes flies in the face of respectful treatment of our dead.

“Like” Live Action News on Facebook for more pro-life news and commentary!

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextLONDON, UNITED KINGDOM - MARCH 24, 2025: Actress Liz Carr (L) and disabled people who oppose assisted dying demonstrate outside the Houses of Parliament as Kim Leadbeater's Assisted Dying Bill enters the final week of its committee stage in London, United Kingdom on March 24, 2025.
Issues

British woman who took husband for assisted suicide in Switzerland wants it legal in UK

Angeline Tan

·

Spotlight Articles