Politics
Guest Column
Virginia Appeals Court to hear challenge to state’s abortion ballot measure
Liberty Counsel
·Spotlight Articles
Delaware's pro-abortion constitutional amendment has stalled, for now
Delaware’s latest move to enshrine abortion rights in its state constitution has stalled for now, after the proposed amendment failed to receive a vote in the House before the conclusion of the 2025-2026 legislative session on June 30.
An amendment which would add abortion as a "right" in the Delaware constitution passed the Senate in 2025, with a two-thirds majority.
Under the Delaware constitution, the bill would need the same number of votes to pass the House, and to then pass both chambers again after the general election.
In March 2025, the initiative passed the Senate by a 15-6 vote, narrowly surpassing the two-thirds majority required for a constitutional amendment. According to Delaware’s constitution, the bill would also need the same supermajority in the House, and then again in both chambers following the next general election.
Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 5, sponsored primarily by Delaware State Senator Bryan Townsend, tried to add a woman’s "reproductive freedom" to the Delaware constitution, making it more challenging to undo than an ordinary state law. Based on the bill, “reproductive freedom” would have covered pregnancy, prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion, miscarriage management, and infertility care.
The state would still reportedly be allowed to regulate abortion after fetal viability, except in cases when the mother’s life or her physical or mental health were at risk.
"Viability," however, is a nebulous term which is highly subjective, and is not based solely on a preborn child's gestational age. The National Abortion Federation claims that "Viability is not a single, fixed point in pregnancy... It depends on clinical circumstances, fetal conditions, available medical resources, and the judgment of the patient and care team..." (emphases added).
In other words, "viability" appears to mean whatever the abortionist wants it to mean.
Moira Sheridan, president of Delaware Right to Life, spoke against the bill during a House Administration Committee meeting earlier in June. She said the group was glad it never made it to the House floor, as “practically speaking we just dodged a bullet.”
“This legislature is relentlessly focused on abortion and will surely bring it up again, especially if they gain a supermajority in the midterm elections, which is likely if faithful Catholics choose to sit them out,” Sheridan said.
The significance of the amendment transcends mere procedure; if it is passed, it would lock in a legal framework that treats abortion as a protected “right” instead of a catastrophic and intentional killing of an innocent human life.
Delaware already has one of the more permissive abortion climates in the region, and abortion advocates have lobbied for years to boost pro-abortion rules. The state legislature moved to further normalize abortion in 2025, with the Senate approving the constitutional amendment by a 15-6 vote, but the House never brought it to the floor before the session ended.
Pro-abortion lawmakers typically portray such amendments to existing rules as “freedom” measures, yet pro-life critics maintain that this kind of wording regularizes abortion, while making limits to abortion harder to protect.
Earlier in 2026, pro-life advocates in Delaware also raised eyebrows regarding legislation they believed jeopardized free speech near abortion facilities. In late June of 2026, pro-life pregnancy centers experienced a victory after Delaware officials agreed to stop enforcing a law targeting them. Together, these developments suggest a state where the abortion lobby continues to be active, but pro-life activities persist.
The defeat of Delaware’s abortion-constitution amendment is a temporary victory for the pro-life movement. However, the amendment can be revived in a future session and brought back before lawmakers again.
For pro-lifers, the lesson from Delaware is clear: vigilance matters. Legislative delays can buy time, but they do not end the campaign to enshrine abortion “rights” in law. The pro-life movement will need to continue to protect both mother and child, rather than supporting and constitutionalizing the murder of preborn life.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Delaware's pro-abortion constitutional amendment has stalled, for now
Delaware’s latest move to enshrine abortion rights in its state constitution has stalled for now, after the proposed amendment failed to receive a vote in the House before the conclusion of the 2025-2026 legislative session on June 30.
An amendment which would add abortion as a "right" in the Delaware constitution passed the Senate in 2025, with a two-thirds majority.
Under the Delaware constitution, the bill would need the same number of votes to pass the House, and to then pass both chambers again after the general election.
In March 2025, the initiative passed the Senate by a 15-6 vote, narrowly surpassing the two-thirds majority required for a constitutional amendment. According to Delaware’s constitution, the bill would also need the same supermajority in the House, and then again in both chambers following the next general election.
Senate Substitute 1 for Senate Bill 5, sponsored primarily by Delaware State Senator Bryan Townsend, tried to add a woman’s "reproductive freedom" to the Delaware constitution, making it more challenging to undo than an ordinary state law. Based on the bill, “reproductive freedom” would have covered pregnancy, prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion, miscarriage management, and infertility care.
The state would still reportedly be allowed to regulate abortion after fetal viability, except in cases when the mother’s life or her physical or mental health were at risk.
"Viability," however, is a nebulous term which is highly subjective, and is not based solely on a preborn child's gestational age. The National Abortion Federation claims that "Viability is not a single, fixed point in pregnancy... It depends on clinical circumstances, fetal conditions, available medical resources, and the judgment of the patient and care team..." (emphases added).
In other words, "viability" appears to mean whatever the abortionist wants it to mean.
Moira Sheridan, president of Delaware Right to Life, spoke against the bill during a House Administration Committee meeting earlier in June. She said the group was glad it never made it to the House floor, as “practically speaking we just dodged a bullet.”
“This legislature is relentlessly focused on abortion and will surely bring it up again, especially if they gain a supermajority in the midterm elections, which is likely if faithful Catholics choose to sit them out,” Sheridan said.
The significance of the amendment transcends mere procedure; if it is passed, it would lock in a legal framework that treats abortion as a protected “right” instead of a catastrophic and intentional killing of an innocent human life.
Delaware already has one of the more permissive abortion climates in the region, and abortion advocates have lobbied for years to boost pro-abortion rules. The state legislature moved to further normalize abortion in 2025, with the Senate approving the constitutional amendment by a 15-6 vote, but the House never brought it to the floor before the session ended.
Pro-abortion lawmakers typically portray such amendments to existing rules as “freedom” measures, yet pro-life critics maintain that this kind of wording regularizes abortion, while making limits to abortion harder to protect.
Earlier in 2026, pro-life advocates in Delaware also raised eyebrows regarding legislation they believed jeopardized free speech near abortion facilities. In late June of 2026, pro-life pregnancy centers experienced a victory after Delaware officials agreed to stop enforcing a law targeting them. Together, these developments suggest a state where the abortion lobby continues to be active, but pro-life activities persist.
The defeat of Delaware’s abortion-constitution amendment is a temporary victory for the pro-life movement. However, the amendment can be revived in a future session and brought back before lawmakers again.
For pro-lifers, the lesson from Delaware is clear: vigilance matters. Legislative delays can buy time, but they do not end the campaign to enshrine abortion “rights” in law. The pro-life movement will need to continue to protect both mother and child, rather than supporting and constitutionalizing the murder of preborn life.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Guest Column
Liberty Counsel
·
Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·
Politics
Nancy Flanders
·
Newsbreak
Melissa Manion
·
Politics
Cassy Cooke
·
Activism
Angeline Tan
·
Activism
Angeline Tan
·
Human Interest
Angeline Tan
·
Activism
Angeline Tan
·
Analysis
Angeline Tan
·Guest Column
Liberty Counsel
·Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·Politics
Nancy Flanders
·Newsbreak
Melissa Manion
·Politics
Cassy Cooke
·Activism
Angeline Tan
·Activism
Angeline Tan
·Human Interest
Angeline Tan
·Activism
Angeline Tan
·Analysis
Angeline Tan
·