Skip to main content
Live Action LogoLive Action
BOSTON, MA - APRIL 3: Massachusetts State Representative Lindsay Sabadosa addresses the gathering as the political group Progressive Massachusetts holds a "lobby day" at the Massachusetts State House in Boston to educate members on lobbying technics, listen to speakers, and visit legislators to advocate for the group's agenda on April 3, 2019.
Photo: Lane Turner/The Boston Globe via Getty Images

Massachusetts House passes bill allowing abortion to birth, for any reason

PoliticsPolitics·By Bridget Sielicki

Massachusetts House passes bill allowing abortion to birth, for any reason

Lawmakers in the Massachusetts House passed a bill Wednesday that will loosen one of the state's current abortion laws by allowing abortion after 24 weeks when approved by a doctor.

Key Takeaways:

  • Bill H.5595 passed the Massachusetts House this week, seeking to remove current restrictions limiting abortion after 24 weeks, effectively allowing abortion up to birth for any reason.

  • The legislation next heads to the state Senate, where it has until the session's ending date of July 31 to pass.

The Details:

Bill H.5595 passed the House with a 119-33 vote. Though current state law does allow abortions after 24 weeks to protect the mother's physical or mental health, or in cases of a fetal diagnosis, this legislation would allow abortions for any reason at any stage, provided a doctor approves.

"We've decided to get away from all the exceptions and trust our medical professionals, who are the best in the world, to make those decisions with the informed consent of the patient," said Rep. Michael Day.

Never miss the latest news in the fight for life.

Those in support of the bill say it is necessary because so many women are traveling out of state for "medically appropriate care."

“Patients have to leave to other states, leave their support network, and pay out of pocket,” State Rep. Christine Barber (D) told The Boston Globe. “You should be able to get care that your doctors are recommending here in Massachusetts.”

“Massachusetts has one of the best health care systems in the country, and patients should be able to rely on their providers to deliver medically appropriate care without restrictions that can fail to account for the complexity of individual medical circumstances,” added state Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa (D), the bill’s co-sponsor.

The legislation next heads to the state Senate, where it has until the session's ending date of July 31 to pass.

Article continues below

Dear Reader,

We’re making a movie! Live Action’s debut feature film, Rise Above, is currently in production, and we need your help to get it across the finish line. When you give $50 or more by July 31st, your gift will help support the production and release of this inspiring film AND will unlock exclusive perks like production updates, behind-the-scenes content, and more. The bigger the gift, the more perks you unlock!

What We're Hearing:

Several health care systems in the state, including Mass General Brigham, Tufts Medicine, Beth Israel Lahey Health, UMass Memorial Health, and the Massachusetts Health & Hospital Association, sent a letter to House Speaker Ron Mariano in support of the bill.

“The legislation would remove arbitrary restrictions on abortion care after 24 weeks of pregnancy and instead empower physicians to use their professional judgment and clinical expertise to make decisions in the best interest of their patients,” the health care groups wrote.

Massachusetts Citizens for Life President Myrna Maloney Flynn noted in a press release:

The good intentions of this bill's sponsors are gravely misplaced.

As written, their abortion-up-to-birth bill permits one physician to subjectively decide that any unborn infant can be killed in or outside of a hospital, even babies capable of surviving outside the womb and feeling pain within it. Women experiencing unimaginable, heart wrenching pregnancy complications absolutely deserve all the support they need, but that support is not what this bill provides.

Instead, this bill ensures increased abortion industry profits and taxpayer-funded late-term procedures. The legislation promises that an already ominous shadow will grow even darker over the state of Massachusetts.

"It's a very sad day in the commonwealth of Massachusetts. The precedent that we're setting is that a mother can get an abortion up until the moment of birth for a healthy, viable baby," said Rep. Alyson Sullivan-Almeida (R).

Zoom In:

Those in support of the bill repeatedly referred to late-term abortions as necessary health care, but the direct and intentional ending of a born or preborn child's life is not necessary, not even in cases of prenatal diagnosis.

At 24 weeks, there is a chance that the child could survive outside the womb if given proper health care. Even if the mother's life or health is at risk, intentionally causing the death of the child is not necessary. Instead, the child could be delivered early and given proper treatment.

Though there is a chance that the baby might still die, this would not be considered an abortion, as the intent of the delivery was to save the mother as well as the child. Children born as young as 21 weeks have survived when given medical care.

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextEDINBURGH, SCOTLAND - SEPTEMBER 24: Demonstrators hold an 'abortion clinic buffer zone' protest outside the Scottish parliament on September 24, 2024 in Edinburgh, Scotland. A new law in Scotland bans protesters from gathering within 200 meters of clinics where abortions are carried out. The anti-abortion group Society for the Protection of Unborn Children has organised protests against the measure. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)
International

Abortion advocate 'queasy' at UK buffer zone free speech implications

Cassy Cooke

·

Spotlight Articles