Is abortion justified if the baby will die anyway?

It is a common misconception that all third trimester abortions are done to save a woman’s life or because there is something wrong with the baby. This recent article shows why third trimester abortions are never needed to save a woman’s life. Live Action News also published an article by Calvin Freiberger, proving that many third trimester abortions kill healthy babies. Few people, even those who consider themselves pro-choice, support killing a healthy, viable baby who is ready to be born just because his mother does not want him. But what about when the baby does have something wrong with him, and he will not live long? Is third trimester abortion justified in that situation?

An abortion in the third trimester is usually committed by inducing labor. Because the baby would often survive if born, she must be killed using digoxin before delivery. This drug is injected into the baby’s heart and causes cardiac arrest. Experts believe the baby is able to feel pain at this point. (Some research indicates pain may be felt by the preborn child as early as 5.5 weeks.) If the digoxin is injected elsewhere in the baby’s body or into the amniotic fluid, the child dies more slowly. In these cases, the baby could suffer for hours.

Dr. Anthony Levatino, a former abortionist, describes the procedure in the following video:

3rd Trimester Induction Abortion: Injection and Stillbirth

The alternative to violently killing the child in utero is giving birth and allowing the baby to die naturally. The parents have the opportunity to meet their baby, and the child dies in the arms of his mother or father, held and loved. Few people get to choose their manner of death, but most people feel that a peaceful death surrounded by loved ones is better than a violent death alone.

Couples who abort their terminally ill babies also tend to suffer from grief and depression. One study shows that 92% of mothers and 82% of fathers of children aborted due to fatal fetal anomaly suffer depression. Another study, in the British Medical Journal study, says:

Anytime a baby dies, parents suffer grief. Does killing the baby through abortion instead of letting her die naturally lessen that grief?

A 2015 study in the journal Prenatal Diagnosis concluded:

Three women who carried their fatally ill children to term agree.

Rosemary Truman rejected abortion for her terminally ill child, who lived only a short time. She says:

Nicolle Reece, mother of a child named Micah who died soon after birth, said:

Amy Kuebelbeck, who rejected abortion after her son Gabriel was diagnosed with a fatal fetal anomaly, said:

Abortion is not justified even if the baby is going to die. It is not better for the child or for her mother and father.

1. Rosemary Truman “A Perfect Memory of Joy, Suffering and Love” [Letter to the Editor] The Age, Melbourne, April 28, 2001, 6

2. Melinda Tankard Reist Defiant Birth: Women Who Resist Medical Eugenics (North Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex, 2006)

3. Melinda Tankard Reist Defiant Birth 207