
EPA to include abortion drugs in chemical tests of drinking water
Bridget Sielicki
·
Women sue Planned Parenthood of Minnesota alleging coerced abortions
Two women have filed a lawsuit, claiming they were coerced into abortions at Planned Parenthood facilities in Minnesota.
Clara Munger Boyer underwent an abortion at Planned Parenthood in 2021, after being pressured into the procedure by the baby's father.
KPS, whose name is sealed, likewise was pressured into an abortion at Planned Parenthood in 2020.
Planned Parenthood has a history of pressuring or coercing women into abortions.
A lawsuit was filed in federal court, claiming Boyer and KPS both had their rights violated when they were made to undergo abortions both say they did not want.
The women said the Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota (PPMNS) affiliate did not do enough to ensure they had true informed consent, or that they had chosen to undergo the abortions freely and of their own volition.
A similar lawsuit, which included Boyer as a plaintiff, was filed last year. KPS does not appear to have been a plaintiff in the first lawsuit.
In the new lawsuit, Boyer said she is a lifelong Minnesota resident who underwent an abortion in November of 2021 at Planned Parenthood's facility in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota:
At the time of her pregnancy, Clara was unmarried and living with her parents.
When Clara discovered she was pregnant, she was surprised and scared. She had never imagined being pregnant without being married. She felt ashamed, embarrassed, and confused.
When Clara first told the baby’s father she was pregnant, he suggested an abortion. Several days later, when they next discussed her pregnancy, he again suggested abortion. If the baby’s father had supported Clara in keeping the baby, she never would have considered abortion.
Clara was experiencing so much stress that her decision-making capability was badly compromised. She felt unable to “think straight.”
Clara believed abortion was morally wrong but felt trapped by her circumstances. She felt confused by the pervasive cultural narrative promoting abortion as a “sacred” constitutional right.
Toward the end of November 2021, Clara and the baby’s father called PPMNS/PPNCS’s Rochester, Minnesota facility, which scheduled the abortion to be performed at PPMNS/PPNCS’s Brooklyn Park, Minnesota facility on November 26, 2021.
When Clara arrived at its Brooklyn Park abortion facility, PPMNS/PPNCS instructed her to sign the "consent" form while in the waiting room before she met with a doctor, nurse, or “counselor.”
The abortion facility doctors, nurses, and workers did not engage in any informed consent process and provided no counseling. There was no discussion about the nature of the abortion procedure – that the abortion would permanently terminate her relationship with her child by terminating the life of her child, an existing human being.
PPMNS/PPNCS did not screen Clara for coercion, pressure, or risk factors for psychological harm. PMNS/PPNCS did not discuss Clara’s moral and religious objections to abortion. It provided no counseling.
If Clara had been properly advised that abortion would terminate her relationship with her child by terminating the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being, she would not have submitted to the abortion. Clara did not know that an abortion killed an existing human being. If she was told that the killing of a child in utero was a murder punishable by life imprisonment, she never would have signed a “consent” for an abortion.
If Clara had been properly advised that the abortion doctors and nurses would be immunized from prosecution under the Minnesota murder statute solely because PPMNS/PPNCS secured her signature on a “consent” form, she would not have submitted to the abortion. Clara’s waiver of her rights and “consent” to the abortion was not knowing and informed, and were not voluntary in the true sense.
Clara’s abortion, which she did not want and which wrongfully deprived her of her 14th Amendment rights and interests, has caused her to suffer extreme mental and emotional anguish, including extreme shame and sadness, depression, anger, remorse, and daily psychological rumination over the loss of her baby.
KPS likewise said she faced pressure to have an abortion, and resisted numerous times; Planned Parenthood reportedly knew of her distress, but moved forward with the abortion anyway:
When KPS realized she was pregnant, she intended to keep and raise her child. She immediately sought prenatal care from an obstetrician. The obstetrician shocked her by suggesting abortion and providing her with a list of abortion facilities.
KPS’s mother insisted that she submit to an abortion.
The father of KPS’s child also demanded she have an abortion. He refused to take any responsibility for the child or provide any financial or emotional support to KPS.
KPS’s mother and the baby’s father continued to pressure her to abort. Despite the pressure being exerted upon her and the stress caused by the prospect of raising her child without any support, KPS was determined to take care of her baby on her own.
Over time, however, KPS was overwhelmed by the mounting pressure, stress of her circumstances, and lack of support, so she telephoned PPMNS/PPNCS’s St. Paul facility, which scheduled an abortion.
When KPS arrived at PPMNS/PPNCS’s St. Paul facility on the day of her scheduled appointment, she could feel her baby kicking. She began to cry and sob. PPMNS/PPNCS workers saw KPS’s distress but did nothing to help her. She fled the facility without submitting to the abortion.
KPS’s deep reluctance to have an abortion and her natural instinct to nurture and protect her baby resulted in a cycle of scheduling three additional appointments which she decided not to attend, and effectively cancelled. KPS wanted to keep her child but felt pressured to submit to the abortion. She was so conflicted and ambivalent that she scheduled and intentionally missed three subsequent abortion appointments.
Although she did not want an abortion, KPS ultimately succumbed to the pressure, stress, and confusion she had been experiencing for weeks. She contacted PPMNS/PPNCS for a fifth time, which again scheduled an abortion.
At one point during KPS’s interactions with PPMNS/PPNCS, when her baby was approximately 20-22 weeks old, a PPMNS/PPNCS worker read a script to her by telephone. There was no discussion about the script. The worker didn’t answer any of KPS’s questions, except one. KPS asked if her baby would feel pain in the abortion. The worker lied and told KPS that what was being removed was “nothing but tissue.”
When KPS arrived at PPMNS/PPNCS’s St. Paul abortion facility for her fifth scheduled appointment, PPMNS/PPNCS required her to sign the “consent” while she was in the waiting room, before speaking with a doctor, nurse, or “counselor.” PPMNS/PPNCS did not engage in any informed consent process. It provided no counseling. There was no discussion about the nature of the abortion procedure – that the abortion would permanently terminate her relationship with her child by terminating the life of her child, an existing human being.
PPMNS/PPNCS performed an ultrasound but did not allow KPS to see the screen despite her request. PPMNS/PPNCS did not tell her the age of her baby.
After the ultrasound, a worker gave KPS an oral drug. PPMNS/PPNCS did not explain the drug’s purpose or effect. After swallowing the pill, KPS told workers she did not want to proceed with the abortion and wanted to leave. PPMNS/PPNCS told KPS that because she had already taken the drug, it was “too late.”
KPS was crying when she was taken into the procedure room. Nobody from PPMNS/PPNCS asked her why she was so distressed. Instead, she was given medication that knocked her out.
When KPS regained full consciousness after the abortion, she asked to see her baby. PPMNS/PPNCS presented KPS with her child’s dismembered remains in a metal pan. KPS saw her dismembered baby’s head and other body parts. She could not stop crying.
Before she left the PPMNS/PPNCS facility, KPS requested her baby’s remains for proper burial. She was advised the remains could be released only after she paid a funeral parlor. Within several days, KPS paid the money and her baby’s remains were released to her. KPS had her baby buried.
Boyer and KPS are far from alone.
As their lawsuit pointed out, Planned Parenthood has a long history of coercing women into abortions they do not want. Some women even say Planned Parenthood staffers physically forced them into abortions they did not want — like Julianne, who was lying on the table when she told them she had changed her mind and told the staff to stop. Instead, she said they drugged her:
“The next moment, I felt a gas mask going over my face. I remember struggling as I understood what was happening to me. I awoke a few minutes later, and my first thought was, ‘I hope they didn’t kill my baby.’ I cried out and asked if they had done the abortion, and of course they had. My grief was overwhelming. So was my shock, anger, and betrayal.”
Another woman, Aimee, said staffers pried her legs open to force her into a surgical abortion:
“I tried to close my legs, but they were spread against my will. They said I was fine and continued the vacuum tube was put in my vagina and the vacuum turned on. I said I wanted to run away and save the life of my baby. They ignored me, I was semi sedated."
Still another woman said she was strapped down so she couldn't run away:
I asked them to please unstrap me and let me leave. The anesthesia was administered, and I fell asleep to the sound of their laughter. When I woke up, I was hurting physically as well as emotionally. All around me were the sounds of other women sobbing.”
Lavonne Wilenken, a nurse practitioner who previously worked at Planned Parenthood, recounted an experience where she witnessed a forced abortion:
“The counselor left hurriedly down the hall and I followed to see exactly what was going on and what I saw in the hall was the counselor, a 17-year-old girl and her aunt, dragging her into the room as she was hollering, ‘No, I don’t want to go! Please don’t make me! Please don’t make me do this! I really don’t want to do this!’
They very hurriedly shoved her in the room where the procedure was to take place and slammed the door and the counselor came out afterwards with a sort of a peaceful smiling look on his face, and I knew what had happened. I knew that they had aborted her against her will.”
Another woman, Emily, explicitly told Planned Parenthood staff that she did not want to undergo an abortion and was being forced by her parents to do so. They did not care:
[M]y cries for help fell upon deaf ears. No one came to save me. I was degraded by the adults there and was told that I was acting like a child.
During the ultrasound, I heard my baby’s heartbeat loud and clear. Halfway through my ultrasound I stood up and ran out of the room and found myself up against a door. That is the last thing I remember aside from waking up in the recovery room.
I imagine that I was drugged to keep quiet. The staff at Planned Parenthood were concerned that I would scare the other women there preparing for their abortions.”
Coercion is not rare within the abortion industry, and all too often, abortionists and abortion staffers look the other way, allowing women to be forced into a life-ending decision they do not want.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Bridget Sielicki
·
Analysis
Cassy Cooke
·
Issues
Nancy Flanders
·
Issues
Anne Marie Williams, RN, BSN
·
Analysis
Cassy Cooke
·
Analysis
Cassy Cooke
·
Analysis
Cassy Cooke
·
Politics
Cassy Cooke
·
International
Cassy Cooke
·
Politics
Cassy Cooke
·
International
Cassy Cooke
·
Women sue Planned Parenthood of Minnesota alleging coerced abortions
Two women have filed a lawsuit, claiming they were coerced into abortions at Planned Parenthood facilities in Minnesota.
Clara Munger Boyer underwent an abortion at Planned Parenthood in 2021, after being pressured into the procedure by the baby's father.
KPS, whose name is sealed, likewise was pressured into an abortion at Planned Parenthood in 2020.
Planned Parenthood has a history of pressuring or coercing women into abortions.
A lawsuit was filed in federal court, claiming Boyer and KPS both had their rights violated when they were made to undergo abortions both say they did not want.
The women said the Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota (PPMNS) affiliate did not do enough to ensure they had true informed consent, or that they had chosen to undergo the abortions freely and of their own volition.
A similar lawsuit, which included Boyer as a plaintiff, was filed last year. KPS does not appear to have been a plaintiff in the first lawsuit.
In the new lawsuit, Boyer said she is a lifelong Minnesota resident who underwent an abortion in November of 2021 at Planned Parenthood's facility in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota:
At the time of her pregnancy, Clara was unmarried and living with her parents.
When Clara discovered she was pregnant, she was surprised and scared. She had never imagined being pregnant without being married. She felt ashamed, embarrassed, and confused.
When Clara first told the baby’s father she was pregnant, he suggested an abortion. Several days later, when they next discussed her pregnancy, he again suggested abortion. If the baby’s father had supported Clara in keeping the baby, she never would have considered abortion.
Clara was experiencing so much stress that her decision-making capability was badly compromised. She felt unable to “think straight.”
Clara believed abortion was morally wrong but felt trapped by her circumstances. She felt confused by the pervasive cultural narrative promoting abortion as a “sacred” constitutional right.
Toward the end of November 2021, Clara and the baby’s father called PPMNS/PPNCS’s Rochester, Minnesota facility, which scheduled the abortion to be performed at PPMNS/PPNCS’s Brooklyn Park, Minnesota facility on November 26, 2021.
When Clara arrived at its Brooklyn Park abortion facility, PPMNS/PPNCS instructed her to sign the "consent" form while in the waiting room before she met with a doctor, nurse, or “counselor.”
The abortion facility doctors, nurses, and workers did not engage in any informed consent process and provided no counseling. There was no discussion about the nature of the abortion procedure – that the abortion would permanently terminate her relationship with her child by terminating the life of her child, an existing human being.
PPMNS/PPNCS did not screen Clara for coercion, pressure, or risk factors for psychological harm. PMNS/PPNCS did not discuss Clara’s moral and religious objections to abortion. It provided no counseling.
If Clara had been properly advised that abortion would terminate her relationship with her child by terminating the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being, she would not have submitted to the abortion. Clara did not know that an abortion killed an existing human being. If she was told that the killing of a child in utero was a murder punishable by life imprisonment, she never would have signed a “consent” for an abortion.
If Clara had been properly advised that the abortion doctors and nurses would be immunized from prosecution under the Minnesota murder statute solely because PPMNS/PPNCS secured her signature on a “consent” form, she would not have submitted to the abortion. Clara’s waiver of her rights and “consent” to the abortion was not knowing and informed, and were not voluntary in the true sense.
Clara’s abortion, which she did not want and which wrongfully deprived her of her 14th Amendment rights and interests, has caused her to suffer extreme mental and emotional anguish, including extreme shame and sadness, depression, anger, remorse, and daily psychological rumination over the loss of her baby.
KPS likewise said she faced pressure to have an abortion, and resisted numerous times; Planned Parenthood reportedly knew of her distress, but moved forward with the abortion anyway:
When KPS realized she was pregnant, she intended to keep and raise her child. She immediately sought prenatal care from an obstetrician. The obstetrician shocked her by suggesting abortion and providing her with a list of abortion facilities.
KPS’s mother insisted that she submit to an abortion.
The father of KPS’s child also demanded she have an abortion. He refused to take any responsibility for the child or provide any financial or emotional support to KPS.
KPS’s mother and the baby’s father continued to pressure her to abort. Despite the pressure being exerted upon her and the stress caused by the prospect of raising her child without any support, KPS was determined to take care of her baby on her own.
Over time, however, KPS was overwhelmed by the mounting pressure, stress of her circumstances, and lack of support, so she telephoned PPMNS/PPNCS’s St. Paul facility, which scheduled an abortion.
When KPS arrived at PPMNS/PPNCS’s St. Paul facility on the day of her scheduled appointment, she could feel her baby kicking. She began to cry and sob. PPMNS/PPNCS workers saw KPS’s distress but did nothing to help her. She fled the facility without submitting to the abortion.
KPS’s deep reluctance to have an abortion and her natural instinct to nurture and protect her baby resulted in a cycle of scheduling three additional appointments which she decided not to attend, and effectively cancelled. KPS wanted to keep her child but felt pressured to submit to the abortion. She was so conflicted and ambivalent that she scheduled and intentionally missed three subsequent abortion appointments.
Although she did not want an abortion, KPS ultimately succumbed to the pressure, stress, and confusion she had been experiencing for weeks. She contacted PPMNS/PPNCS for a fifth time, which again scheduled an abortion.
At one point during KPS’s interactions with PPMNS/PPNCS, when her baby was approximately 20-22 weeks old, a PPMNS/PPNCS worker read a script to her by telephone. There was no discussion about the script. The worker didn’t answer any of KPS’s questions, except one. KPS asked if her baby would feel pain in the abortion. The worker lied and told KPS that what was being removed was “nothing but tissue.”
When KPS arrived at PPMNS/PPNCS’s St. Paul abortion facility for her fifth scheduled appointment, PPMNS/PPNCS required her to sign the “consent” while she was in the waiting room, before speaking with a doctor, nurse, or “counselor.” PPMNS/PPNCS did not engage in any informed consent process. It provided no counseling. There was no discussion about the nature of the abortion procedure – that the abortion would permanently terminate her relationship with her child by terminating the life of her child, an existing human being.
PPMNS/PPNCS performed an ultrasound but did not allow KPS to see the screen despite her request. PPMNS/PPNCS did not tell her the age of her baby.
After the ultrasound, a worker gave KPS an oral drug. PPMNS/PPNCS did not explain the drug’s purpose or effect. After swallowing the pill, KPS told workers she did not want to proceed with the abortion and wanted to leave. PPMNS/PPNCS told KPS that because she had already taken the drug, it was “too late.”
KPS was crying when she was taken into the procedure room. Nobody from PPMNS/PPNCS asked her why she was so distressed. Instead, she was given medication that knocked her out.
When KPS regained full consciousness after the abortion, she asked to see her baby. PPMNS/PPNCS presented KPS with her child’s dismembered remains in a metal pan. KPS saw her dismembered baby’s head and other body parts. She could not stop crying.
Before she left the PPMNS/PPNCS facility, KPS requested her baby’s remains for proper burial. She was advised the remains could be released only after she paid a funeral parlor. Within several days, KPS paid the money and her baby’s remains were released to her. KPS had her baby buried.
Boyer and KPS are far from alone.
As their lawsuit pointed out, Planned Parenthood has a long history of coercing women into abortions they do not want. Some women even say Planned Parenthood staffers physically forced them into abortions they did not want — like Julianne, who was lying on the table when she told them she had changed her mind and told the staff to stop. Instead, she said they drugged her:
“The next moment, I felt a gas mask going over my face. I remember struggling as I understood what was happening to me. I awoke a few minutes later, and my first thought was, ‘I hope they didn’t kill my baby.’ I cried out and asked if they had done the abortion, and of course they had. My grief was overwhelming. So was my shock, anger, and betrayal.”
Another woman, Aimee, said staffers pried her legs open to force her into a surgical abortion:
“I tried to close my legs, but they were spread against my will. They said I was fine and continued the vacuum tube was put in my vagina and the vacuum turned on. I said I wanted to run away and save the life of my baby. They ignored me, I was semi sedated."
Still another woman said she was strapped down so she couldn't run away:
I asked them to please unstrap me and let me leave. The anesthesia was administered, and I fell asleep to the sound of their laughter. When I woke up, I was hurting physically as well as emotionally. All around me were the sounds of other women sobbing.”
Lavonne Wilenken, a nurse practitioner who previously worked at Planned Parenthood, recounted an experience where she witnessed a forced abortion:
“The counselor left hurriedly down the hall and I followed to see exactly what was going on and what I saw in the hall was the counselor, a 17-year-old girl and her aunt, dragging her into the room as she was hollering, ‘No, I don’t want to go! Please don’t make me! Please don’t make me do this! I really don’t want to do this!’
They very hurriedly shoved her in the room where the procedure was to take place and slammed the door and the counselor came out afterwards with a sort of a peaceful smiling look on his face, and I knew what had happened. I knew that they had aborted her against her will.”
Another woman, Emily, explicitly told Planned Parenthood staff that she did not want to undergo an abortion and was being forced by her parents to do so. They did not care:
[M]y cries for help fell upon deaf ears. No one came to save me. I was degraded by the adults there and was told that I was acting like a child.
During the ultrasound, I heard my baby’s heartbeat loud and clear. Halfway through my ultrasound I stood up and ran out of the room and found myself up against a door. That is the last thing I remember aside from waking up in the recovery room.
I imagine that I was drugged to keep quiet. The staff at Planned Parenthood were concerned that I would scare the other women there preparing for their abortions.”
Coercion is not rare within the abortion industry, and all too often, abortionists and abortion staffers look the other way, allowing women to be forced into a life-ending decision they do not want.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Bridget Sielicki
·
Analysis
Cassy Cooke
·
Issues
Nancy Flanders
·
Issues
Anne Marie Williams, RN, BSN
·
Analysis
Cassy Cooke
·
Analysis
Cassy Cooke
·
Analysis
Cassy Cooke
·
Politics
Cassy Cooke
·
International
Cassy Cooke
·
Politics
Cassy Cooke
·
International
Cassy Cooke
·