
Missouri pro-life amendment may be boosted by ban on 'gender' procedures for minors
Angeline Tan
·
Trump’s HHS probes 13 states for alleged breaching of conscience protections
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) under President Donald Trump has initiated a probe into 13 states over claims that they may have breached federal conscience laws protecting individuals who oppose abortion on moral or religious grounds.
HHS has launched a probe into 13 states that it believes have discriminated against and pressured healthcare providers, religious institutions, pro-life businesses, and other employers to buy insurance coverage that pays for abortion, despite their convictions.
This type of action, according to the Trump Administration, violates the Weldon Amendment.
Several states have made it so that religious institutions, pro-life businesses, and other employers have been forced to purchase insurance that covers abortion, against their consciences. These states are California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, Oregon, and Washington.
On March 18, the HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) sent letters to the 13 states, seeking details to assess potential violations of the Weldon Amendment, a federal appropriations measure that forbids state or local governments receiving federal funds from penalizing healthcare providers who decline to perform, refer for, cover, or finance abortions, The Hill reported.
Should breaches be discovered, the HHS will first try to resolve matters informally, failing which OCR may move to curb federal funding or refer the case to the Department of Justice for further action.
On March 19, the OCR said its probe is premised on reports that these states may have pressured healthcare providers to include or fund abortion services as a prerequisite for offering health insurance within their jurisdictions.
Although HHS did not name the states at first, there are several that have made it so that religious institutions, pro-life businesses, and other employers may find themselves forced to purchase insurance coverage that entails abortion, even when this directly contradicts their beliefs about the sanctity of human life from conception. These states are California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Vermont, Oregon, and Washington.
An HHS official testified during a March 18 press briefing that these states mandated insurance plans to include abortion coverage.
The OCR also upholds federal rules in grant and block grant programs that ban discrimination against individuals according to their religion.
Since its passage in 2005, the scope of the interpretation has fluctuated along partisan lines, expanding or contracting based on which political party is at the helm, according to Mary Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California, Davis.
Democratic administrations typically read the amendment more narrowly and pro-life administrations have interpreted it to extend robust protection to employers, insurers, and plan sponsors. During the pro-abortion Biden-Harris administration, HHS claimed that Weldon did not apply to employers or other plan sponsors, granting states more room to make abortion coverage in standard plans compulsory.
Ziegler noted that as the Weldon Amendment does not explicitly include employers or plan sponsors in the list of healthcare entities, this omission could encourage Democrats’ reading of the law, though courts have yet to come to a conclusion about the issue.
The Trump administration, however, maintains that Weldon’s protection “applies to healthcare entities, including health insurance issuers and health plans,” and thus protects pro-life advocates who refuse to have their insurance plans include abortion coverage.
Meanwhile, HHS OCR Director Paula M. Stannard declared that “OCR launches these investigations to address certain states’ alleged disregard of, or confusion about, compliance with the Weldon Amendment,” as cited by EWTN News. “Under the Weldon Amendment, health care entities, such as health insurance issuers and health plans, are protected from state discrimination for not paying for, or providing coverage of, abortion contrary to conscience. Period.”
During a conference call, an HHS official stated that the Office for Civil Rights is examining all states with “some type of mandate” that demand insurance plans “cover abortion, regardless of whether or not [an entity] … objects on the basis of religious belief or conscience.”
Additionally, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Committee on Religious Liberty published a 2026 report urging Congress to enact the Conscience Protection Act, in order to fortify and extend conscience rights protections nationwide.
For pro-life advocates, this recent development is a clear indicator that the Trump administration regards mandatory abortion coverage without conscience provisions as a form of discrimination against pro-life individuals who refuse to be involved in abortion in any manner.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Angeline Tan
·
Politics
Angeline Tan
·
Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·
Politics
Angeline Tan
·
Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·
Politics
Nancy Flanders
·
Politics
Angeline Tan
·
Analysis
Angeline Tan
·
Politics
Angeline Tan
·
International
Angeline Tan
·
Politics
Angeline Tan
·