
Washington state says its stockpiled abortion pills will expire soon
Carole Novielli
·(Life Legal) A perfect storm is brewing in Planned Parenthood’s lawsuit against the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) and its board members. On Wednesday July 17, federal District Court Judge William Orrick will hear nine motions brought by the pro-life defendants, represented by Life Legal and other legal groups, and one motion brought by Planned Parenthood Federation of America and the nine Planned Parenthood affiliates.
Four years ago today, CMP released the first of a series of videos showing Planned Parenthood officials negotiating the sale of baby body parts for profit. Shortly after the release, Planned Parenthood sued CMP and its board members for millions in damages. The abortion giant maintains it had to increase security at many of its affiliates because of a “dramatic increase in the threats, harassment, and criminal activities targeting abortion providers,” including nearly 850 incidents of vandalism alone in July and August of 2015 and a nine-fold increase in “security incidents” following the release.
READ: Judge with Planned Parenthood ties orders undercover pro-life journalist to pay $195k fine
Through extensive discovery, Life Legal attorneys found these assertions to be blatantly false. Instead of 850 incidents, there were 20—none of which were connected to the videos. For example, one act of vandalism Planned Parenthood reported was actually committed by the ex-partner of a PP employee who later set a fire at the clinic for personal reasons that had nothing to do with CMP.
We discovered that Planned Parenthood equated a “dramatic increase in harassment” with non-threatening letters and phone calls. Anyone who expressed opposition to abortion was characterized as a security threat. Some of the “harassment” PP cited were letters from people who simply wrote “Jesus loves you” or “our church is praying for you.”
Planned Parenthood even tried to blame a death threat on CMP. After further inquiry, however, we learned that the threat actually occurred a week before the release of the videos and involved a patient who threatened a PP staffer.
Planned Parenthood Medical Director Mary Gatter, who was shown on video haggling over the price of baby parts, joking “I want a Lamborghini,” insisted that she received numerous death threats through social media, but when pressed, Gatter admitted she is not actually on any social media platforms.
Moreover, we learned that PP defines “security incidents” as any incidents that are simply “unusual” or “out of the ordinary.” Many of these so-called incidents referred to lawful, constitutionally protected speech outside of abortion clinics. But because the speech did not comport with Planned Parenthood’s view that children are disposable, it was classified as a security threat.
Dear Reader,
Every day in America, more than 2,800 preborn babies lose their lives to abortion.
That number should break our hearts and move us to action.
Ending this tragedy requires daily commitment from people like you who refuse to stay silent.
Millions read Live Action News each month — imagine the impact if each of us took a stand for life 365 days a year.
Right now, we’re urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly donors) to join us before the end of October. And thanks to a generous $250,000 matching grant, your first monthly gift will be DOUBLED to help save lives and build a culture that protects the preborn.
Will you become one of the 500 today? Click here now to become a Live Action Life Defender and have your first gift doubled.
Together, we can end abortion and create a future where every child is cherished and every mother is supported.
Some of the more comical “security incidents” reported included a male patient asking a staffer on a date, staffer boyfriend troubles, and an aggressive telemarketer. PP tried to attribute all of these to the videos to justify extorting millions of dollars from CMP for additional security measures.
But Life Legal attorneys dug deep and exposed their lies.
Planned Parenthood spent exorbitant sums on state-of-the-art security upgrades at numerous PP affiliates and hired a security director at a salary of over $610,000 per year. These measures have nothing to do with CMP investigators gaining entrance into the abortion cartel’s top-secret baby-killing conventions.
READ: Judge Orrick holds undercover pro-life journalist David Daleiden in contempt of court
“For the past three years, Life Legal’s goal in discovery has been to lay the groundwork for summary judgment,” said Life Legal’s Vice President of Legal Affairs Katie Short.“We have shown that Planned Parenthood’s claims of a ‘surge’ in threats and violence are fabricated. This means PP does not have a claim against our client and the lawsuit should be dismissed.”
We know that Planned Parenthood is a darling of San Francisco’s leftist establishment, but their case against CMP’s board members is utterly lacking in evidence. Please pray that the judge sees through Planned Parenthood’s outright lies and rules in our favor. If he does not, trial will begin on September 30.
Editor’s Note: This article was published at Life Legal and is reprinted here with permission.
“Like” Live Action News on Facebook for more pro-life news and commentary!
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Carole Novielli
·Guest Column
Mike Spencer
·Guest Column
Mark Lee Dickson
·Activism
Nancy Flanders
·Activism
Bridget Sielicki
·Guest Column
Mark Lee Dickson
·Guest Column
Guest
·Activism
Guest
·Guest Column
Guest
·Guest Column
Guest
·Guest Column
Guest
·