
Human rights court sides with Polish woman who sought eugenic abortion
Nancy Flanders
·
Federal judge strikes down California law restricting pro-life speech
A federal judge has struck down a California law that would have prohibited the right of pro-lifers to protest outside abortion facilities in the state.
SB 742 was signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2021 under the guise of protecting COVID-19 vaccination sites. The law created a 100-foot buffer zone around any vaccine administration site and banned free-speech activities within 30 feet of any person who is within 100 feet of the vaccine site. The bill particularly noted that “harassment” would be defined as approaching or standing within 30 feet of anyone “for the purpose of passing a leaflet or handbill to, displaying a sign to, or engaging in oral protest, education, or counseling with, that other person in a public way or on a sidewalk area.”
Pro-life groups were quick to call attention to the law, noting that it effectively banned all advocacy outside many abortion facilities, since some, like Planned Parenthood, administer vaccines.
Several pro-life groups sued following the law’s enactment, and the law was temporarily blocked in November 2021 after a judge ruled that the 30-foot prohibition was too restrictive. Life Legal Defense Foundation, one of the organizations that filed a federal lawsuit against the law, announced Thursday that a federal judge had struck down the provision that infringed on the rights of pro-lifers to gather outside abortion facilities.
Dear Reader,
Have you ever wanted to share the miracle of human development with little ones? Live Action is proud to present the "Baby Olivia" board book, which presents the content of Live Action's "Baby Olivia" fetal development video in a fun, new format. It's perfect for helping little minds understand the complex and beautiful process of human development in the womb.
Receive our brand new Baby Olivia board book when you give a one-time gift of $30 or more (or begin a new monthly gift of $15 or more) to fuel Live Action’s life-saving content.
According to the group, the court held that “the prohibition on ‘harassing’ in the statute violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments,” noting that “[T]he loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.”
“We are pleased that the court emphasized the unconstitutionality of the legislature’s shameless abuse of the term ‘harassing’ to encompass protected speech and activities,” said Life Legal’s Katie Short, who litigated the case before the court. “At a time when all manner of liberties is in jeopardy, pro-lifers – even in California – can be assured that federal courts have not wholly abandoned fundamental First Amendment principles.”
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Nancy Flanders
·
Politics
Mark Wiltz
·
Issues
Angeline Tan
·
Issues
Angeline Tan
·
Issues
Cassy Cooke
·
Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·
Abortion Pill
Bridget Sielicki
·
Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·
Human Interest
Bridget Sielicki
·
Human Interest
Bridget Sielicki
·
Issues
Bridget Sielicki
·