
Texas lawmakers pass bill to stop flow of abortion pills into state
Bridget Sielicki
·Contrary to popular belief, late-term abortions aren’t always done for medical reasons
Pro-choice activists often claim that late-term abortions are done only for the direst of reasons, and that abortions late in the second trimester are only committed due to risks to the mother’s life or a fatal condition in the baby. But an article in the Sacramento News Review, in which a reporter visited an abortion facility and interviewed workers there, reveals otherwise.
The profiled abortion facility did between 500 and 800 late-term abortions annually, up through the 24th week. The facility also did 2000 to 3000 first trimester abortions annually.
The article’s author says:
According to one abortion worker, Britta (no last name given): “It’s different every day.”
So the abortion workers at this facility have seen women come in for sex selection abortions. Other women have aborted because they didn’t know they were pregnant until late in their pregnancies, or because of changes in life circumstances. In these cases, both mother and baby were perfectly healthy. This is a far cry from the pro-abortion claim that all women who have abortions after 20 weeks are critically ill or pregnant with dying babies.
The article profiled a number of women who were having late-term abortions.
One, a 17-year-old named Leslie, came to the clinic just under the 24-week limit for a D&E abortion. A D&E is the most common method of abortion used in the second trimester. It consists of dilating the woman’s cervix with rods called laminaria which slowly stretch the opening of the uterus overnight. On the second day, the baby is dismembered with forceps and pulled out piece by piece. Dr. Anthony Levatino illustrates this procedure in a video for Live Action.
Here is a picture of the arm and foot of a baby dismembered by D&E at 20 weeks, four weeks younger than Leslie’s baby.
From Citizens for a Pro-Life Society
Although only 17, Leslie did not tell her parents she was pregnant and having an abortion. The author of the article quotes Leslie:
Despite her seeming ambivalence, Leslie had her abortion. While her baby was being aborted, she held onto a little stuffed tiger for comfort.
The author also wrote about another woman having a second trimester abortion:
This woman also seems ambivalent about having an abortion. She obviously has serious problems in her life, but it is unlikely that an abortion will improve her situation.
Studies have linked abortion with higher rates of substance abuse and depression. Women who have abortions are also more likely to seek psychiatric treatment and to commit suicide.
After committing her abortion, this abortion facility sent the woman struggling with substance abuse home to cope with her abortion on her own. They did not attempt to refer her to a rehab facility or help her with her underlying problems. All they did was kill her baby and send her on her way.
The article then mentions another woman who had an abortion because her child may have had Down syndrome. Her pregnancy had originally been wanted, but the medical risks of having a child with down syndrome convinced her to abort.
The article also profiles Vicki Simpson, who works at Planned Parenthood. In her case, the baby had catastrophic birth defects which would not allow the child to survive. Simpson had the option of carrying to term and giving birth to her baby naturally and spending time with the child before he or she passed away. Instead, she chose to abort by D&E.
The abortionist had offered her the possibility of inducing birth, so that she could hold and say goodbye to the baby. He warned her that with a D&E, “Chances are, you won’t want to see the fetus.” Indeed, seeing the body parts of her dismembered child would have been a traumatic experience.
While Simpson claimed not to regret her abortion, it was not easy for her, according to the article’s author:
As a Planned Parenthood worker, Simpson supports women who have late-term abortions regardless of the reason.
Erin Greenough was another abortion worker who aborted a baby that would’ve had a disability. The article’s author says:
Choosing not to take the chance that the baby would have a disability even if she survived, Greenough had an abortion. Her abortion was done by inducing labor prematurely. She does not regret the abortion, but says she wishes she’d spent more time with her baby’s body in order to say goodbye. She was shocked when she delivered her child.
“No one explained that she would be perfectly formed,” she said.
It’s impossible to know whether the knowledge of her baby’s level of development would’ve changed her mind about the abortion.
Another woman who worked in the abortion clinic, Tammy, also aborted a child diagnosed with a disability. At the time of her pregnancy, Tammy had a strong Christian faith. Her faith caused her to be uncertain about having the abortion.
Her baby had hydrocephalus, a buildup of fluid in the brain. A shunt placed in the child’s brain could have allowed her child to live a normal life. However, there was still the risk of the baby would not survive, and Tammy did not want to put herself through the stress of not knowing.
Perhaps trying to justify her abortion, she now works in the abortion facility, helping other women have abortions. She still claims to be a Christian. According to the author:
So as we can see, the article shows that there are many reasons women have late-term abortions. Cases where the baby has a fatal condition do happen. But so do cases where the baby could survive but would have a disability, and cases where the baby would be perfectly healthy.
Children with disabilities have the same right to life as children without disabilities. Their disabilities do not invalidate their human rights. Many people with disabilities live full, happy lives.
Yet even healthy babies are killed in second trimester abortions. In Leslie’s case, her baby would have been born without any disabilities. Even though Leslie seemed unsure, the abortion workers committed her abortion and sent her home. Her parents were never made aware of the loss of their grandchild, or of the heavy burden their 17-year-old daughter would carry for the rest of her life.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Bridget Sielicki
·Investigative
Nancy Flanders
·Investigative
Bridget Sielicki
·Investigative
Carole Novielli
·Investigative
Sheena Rodriguez
·Analysis
Carole Novielli
·Guest Column
Sarah Terzo
·Abortion Pill
Sarah Terzo
·Guest Column
Sarah Terzo
·Guest Column
Sarah Terzo
·Guest Column
Sarah Terzo
·