So this is choice?

Not exactly the textbook definition.

Words matter. The words we choose have meaning and consequences. There is, of course, a reason why abortion supporters prefer the terms “abortion” and “termination” to “baby-killing.”

Now, I’m not advocating for pro-lifers to go around and yell “baby-killing” at everyone they meet. What I’m saying is that abortion, by definition, is baby-killing, but abortion supporters hate that term.

They know that the average person does not want to think that she supports baby killing. But abortion? Or even better, termination? Well, yeah, when something is terminated, it’s ended. What’s so bad about “ending” something you never planned on doing in the first place? See what I mean? There are reasons why each side chooses the particular words it uses.

If we really wanted to get into it, there’s a whole lot that could be said about pro-abortion vs. pro-choice vs. anti-life and anti-abortion vs. anti-choice vs. pro-life. Personally, I think I would be fine with each side framing its own title, as long as it was honest, and as long as each side wouldn’t get all bent out of shape by someone on the opposing side using a different term that was also honest. (Oh, yes…and as long as the media agreed to use the terms we each choose for ourselves. Fat chance, I know.)

We all make choices every day. The issue isn’t the right to choose, but instead what it is we’re choosing.

For instance, most abortion supporters (you can tell my preferred term, I’m sure) like being called “pro-choice.” Fine. It’s honest that you think a woman should have the choice to kill her baby, as long as the baby isn’t born and seen by the outside world yet. I doubt that many of you would like that part of the “choice” to be fully explained, but whatever. You support that choice.

It’s equally honest, though, for me to call you “abortion supporters.” That’s different from “pro-abortion.” Pro-abortion, as some of you point out, indicates that you like abortion. Right? I mean, typically, if you are “pro”-something, you like it. And you argue that you don’t really like abortion; you just think it should be legal. Hence why I prefer the term “abortion supporters.” Try to argue against it if you like, but if you support a woman’s ability to choose abortion, you support abortion. You want to keep it legal. You want to keep it available. That’s pretty much what support is.

That said (and there’s much more that could be said), I have a few major reasons why I disagree with the term “pro-choice.” I’ll say up front that my analysis can’t be applied to every single abortion supporter out there. But it applies to plenty.

  1. Choice is somewhat irrelevant to the debate. Or rather, it could be relevant to any debate under the sun, so it’s a candy-coated term that tries to avoid the real issue. The real issue is abortion. The real issue is life vs. death. It’s not “choice.” We make choices every day – in almost every moment of our day. We’re all “pro-choice.” We realize that human beings can and do make choices. But what would all the abortion supporters start saying if rapists wanted to call themselves “pro-choice”? I mean, come on. They obviously believe in their right to choose which women they can have sex with, whether the women want it or not. They want to enforce their choice on an innocent human being. They want to silence her voice. They don’t care how she feels or how she wants to live her life. They believe in their own right to choose. Yeah, I’m not really liking that classification. But sorry – abortion supporters are no more “pro-choice” than rapists are. Just admit it: you support the right to choose abortion. You’re abortion supporters. Yes, I know that many of you also support the right to choose adoption or birth, but those aren’t contested issues in our society, so it would be pretty pointless to call yourselves “adoption supporters” or “birth supporters.”   think we’d all fit into those categories.
  2. Abortion supporters, it turns out, often don’t truly support choice. Have you ever heard a “pro-choice” person criticizing the Duggars for having twenty children? Uh-huh. I thought so. What about the Duggars’ choice? So what if you wouldn’t have twenty kids? They did, and by all accounts, they’re doing a pretty good job. What about “pro-choice” people who criticize Bristol Palin for her choice to keep her baby and speak out for abstinence? Why is she banned from choice? If you truly support choice, why can’t you be just as vocal about standing up for large families or abstinence supporters (who are criticized commonly) as you are for women who choose abortion? If it’s really all about choice, where are you for the Duggars, Bristol Palin, Octomom, and the like? Oh right, you’re not there for them at all – because it’s not about choice. It’s about abortion.
  3. No one – and I repeat, no one – should have the “right to choose” to kill someone else. This would be like the killers in the Rwandan genocide claiming they were “pro-machete” or jihadists claiming they are “pro-explosives in airplanes” or other such nonsense. Let’s just get to the point. You support the right to choose to kill a baby.
  4. Many abortion supporters try to silence those who speak out against abortion. Again, if it’s all about choice, what ever happened to my choice to tell America what abortion really is? What about my choice to stand in front of abortion clinics and hand out literature to pregnant women (if I were to do that)? What about my choice to help my fellow Colorado citizens exercise their choice on whether or not to define every unborn child as a person? Oh, I guess when my choices conflict with the choice (read, abortion) that you support, my choices no longer matter.

While I could come up with many serious examples of cruel, violent, and extremely rude things that have been said to pro-lifers I know, I’ll close with this somewhat amusing true story instead.

When my brother was 11 or 12 years old, he was helping me collect signatures for a petition to Congress to ban partial-birth abortion and to stop infanticide (the killing of babies who survive an abortion attempt). He was a cute kid with freckles and sandy hair, so an old, grandmotherly lady came up to him outside the store where we were standing. She saw he was collecting signatures and asked, “What do you have here, Honey?” My brother figured this would be an easy signature. After all, sweet grandmotherly ladies would want to help babies, right? Wrong. Dead wrong. When he explained to her what we were collecting signatures for, her face instantly changed and she growled, “You go to hell” and stomped off.

True story.

Apparently, when a pro-life kid wants to exercise his choice and spend a few hours standing outside collecting signatures, he’s condemned to hell by those who claim to believe in choice. And this is choice?

What is Live Action News?

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective. Learn More

Corrections or Questions

For corrections, or questions, please contact the editor at [email protected]

GUEST ARTICLES: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email [email protected] with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

To Top
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]
[if lte IE 8]