Skip to main content
Live Action LogoLive Action
A gavel sits on a table in front of an open book and a scale.

Fighting the HHS mandate

PoliticsPolitics·By Heidi Miller

Fighting the HHS mandate

The HHS mandate, which requires employers to provide abortion-inducing drugs within insurance plans for employees, has caused many cases to be filed in protest, arguing that this mandate violates the freedom of religion. While cases such as the Hobby Lobby’s have received more attention, over 40 have been filed in total.

Alliance Defending Freedom published a breakdown of the cases, including whether the business involved is for-profit business or non-for profit and what type of relief was granted or denied. Here is a summary of that breakdown:

Article continues below

Dear Reader,

In 2026, Live Action is heading straight where the battle is fiercest: college campuses.

We have a bold initiative to establish 100 Live Action campus chapters within the next year, and your partnership will make it a success!

Your support today will help train and equip young leaders, bring Live Action’s educational content into academic environments, host on-campus events and debates, and empower students to challenge the pro-abortion status quo with truth and compassion.

Invest in pro-life grassroots outreach and cultural formation with your DOUBLED year-end gift!

Out of the fifteen cases that were filed by for-profit business, almost half (seven) have received an injunction, causing the penalties imposed in the HHS mandate not to take effect against the companies until their respective cases have been heard on the merits. Two of these cases are on appeal, while five (including Hobby Lobby’s) have had the injunctions denied. The Hobby Lobby case is the only HHS mandate case to have made it up to the Supreme Court level. One for-profit case is awaiting the outcome on whether or not it will be dismissed.

Twenty-nine cases have been brought by non-profit companies against the HHS mandate. These cases have met with arguments that they were filed too early, due to the “protection” of the Temporary Enforcement Safe Harbor and a new rule-making process. Only one case has survived a Motion to Dismiss, while seven have already been dismissed. Fifteen cases are currently pending the outcome of a Motion to Dismiss. Four cases have been stayed, and two are too early in the process to have received an outcome. For many cases that have been dismissed, an appeal will be brought to continue to fight against the provisions of the mandate.

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextScientist pipetting sample into tray for DNA testing in laboratory,Close up fertility laboratory the scientist preparing embryo cultivation plates
Opinion

Research shows Catholic support for IVF declines once Church teaching is understood

Angeline Tan

·

Spotlight Articles