
Parents of babies with anencephaly have ethical, life-honoring options
Nancy Flanders
·
Investigative·By Carole Novielli
'Dirty work': How abortion industry workers really feel about their jobs
For decades, abortionists and abortion workers have noted the negative feelings and views associated with their chosen profession. Despite the best efforts of abortion advocates to "de-stigmatize" the act of abortion, which intentionally ends the life of a human being in the womb, the stigma and negative feelings associated with such an act rightfully persist.
Over the decades, little has changed regarding how abortion workers view their professions. They have referred to it as "dirty work," have stated they feel "ostracized" and isolated, say they are not respected and/or are stigmatized, and more.
Many express having difficulties with dealing with the direct killing and/or disposal of the remains of aborted children.
Many also express disdain toward women who come for repeat abortions and who choose not to use contraception to prevent pregnancy.
In a 1978 paper entitled, "What Abortion Counselors Want from Their Clients," Carole Joffe described abortion work as “dirty work," writing in part:
Dirty work... has several components: it can be physically repellent, symbolically degrading, morally dubious, and yet, under certain conditions... Abortion counseling encompasses all these aspects of dirty work.
The physically trying parts of the job involve confrontation with blood, vomit, and, in some instances, discernible fetal parts.
A certain symbolic degradation occurs with the counselor's responsibility for the post-abortion cleanup, which includes disposing of the "products of conception."
In 1993, the late pro-life strategist, Mark Crutcher sent an undercover survey to 961 U.S. abortion providers and then published the results in a report called Project Choice. Those results showed:
69% of the nation’s abortion providers say they are not respected in the medical community.
65% feel ostracized...
Almost 1 in 5 has been denied hospital privileges...
64% say that performing abortion causes a negative impact on the non-abortion part of their practice.
60% say that their prestige as a physician is damaged...
38% express moral misgivings about the abortion procedure.
Staffers have described dismemberment (D&E) abortions as evoking moral qualms, feelings that the procedure is "horrible," “emotional distress,” and “nightmares.”
In 2013, late-term abortionist Susan Robinson admitted:
'Being an abortion provider is very stigmatized. Other doctors look down on you and think of you as like the lowest of the low.'
Abortion staff have long been conflicted surrounding abortion, with some OBGYN residents stating in a 2015 report:
If my first task as a physician is to do no harm, how can I justify harming a fetus?
Seeing the fetus on an ultrasound scan and then watching it as we did the procedure really shook me to the core.
A paper published in 2022, "Providers’ experiences with abortion care: A scoping review," found:
... [P]roviders discussed the challenge of disclosing their work... and... noted that they do not feel comfortable talking about their work at home as their partners think that abortion is “distasteful”... that some family members or friends would never speak to them again if they knew about their work....
... [M]any described the challenge in deciding whether to share their involvement in abortion care... that disclosing their work could damage existing friendships....
... [M]any said that they were morally challenged by certain aspects of care. These included experiences with the fetus, differences between surgical and medical methods, providing care for cases that are medically indicated versus those that are not, and select cases where providers believed that abortion is being used as a method of contraception.
The paper also described abortion workers' feelings about being faced with the death of innocent preborn children:
Many discussed how contact with the fetal remains is a difficult aspect of care. Midwives in Japan noted sadness, confusion, and guilt when handling the remains, while nurses in the UK described the experience as “undignified”, “horrible”, and “like a bereavement”.
Increasing gestational age at the time of abortion was also a significant challenge.
Authors cited a U.S. provider, who said:
"You always see the pictures that anti-choice people protest with mangled fetuses and stuff. I had never really connected that to our work, so I was like, ‘wow, this actually is, at that point, a little fetus.’ Which is surprising to me, but it didn’t change the way I feel about abortion at all...."
Staff burnout, ambivalence, and nightmares have also been cited among U.S. abortion staff.
Live Action News recently discovered the existence of another source reinforcing the existence of abortion workers' negative emotions.
A publicly available PowerPoint uploaded by FIAPAC.org, a group founded in 1997 that holds international conferences on abortion, discusses 'Repeat abortion provoked negative emotions' among abortion facility staffers. The presentation's author also claimed that abortion workers experience judgmental opinions, a "sense of isolation," and negative views about their chosen profession.
The presentation, entitled "Abortion Care Research: The Staff Perspective," was presented by Dr. Edna Astbury-Ward, who was the "Visiting Research Fellow Institute of Health, Medical Science and Society Social Inclusion Research Unit Glynd ŵr University Wrexham."
The author presented her findings as part of a paper at the 9th Conference of the International Federation of Professional Abortion and Contraception Associates (FIAPAC) in October of 2010 in Seville, Spain. The findings were included on the FIAPAC website and were also documented in a separately published paper. Dr. Astbury-Ward's conference attendance, according to her presentation, was "sponsored by Marie Stopes International [MSI]" (now MSI Reproductive Choices, due to the group's efforts to distance itself from its eugenic history). The UK-based abortion provider claims to now work in 36 countries across six continents.
The PowerPoint presentation noted that the author conducted "in depth semi-structured face to face interviews... with 8 staff who provided care for women before, during and after abortion." The staff worked at "a variety of settings such as community contraception clinics, gynaecology wards and abortion assessment clinics."
Though this is a very small number of participants, the findings reinforced what abortion workers have been saying for decades.

The presentation noted "emotional challenges" of the job, including "[p]ersonal opinions compromised, [r]epeat abortions, [f]oetal abnormality." According to the presentation:
Staff were motivated by a desire to provide care for women in need.
Abortion care work was challenging at times.
Isolation was experienced as part of the job.
Repeat abortion provoked negative emotions.
Foetal abnormality commanded greater sympathy.
Inequitable access to abortion compromised care.
Evidence of some judgemental [sic] opinions.
Dr. Astbury-Ward found that, like in the U.S., working in abortion elsewhere is an "considered... an unpopular job" and that abortion workers experience "isolation," "fear," and "vulnerability":
Working in abortion care presented a unique set of social, emotional and practical challenges for staff...some staff expressed a sense of isolation from other colleagues.
They said that those who didn’t work in abortion care considered it an unpopular job and perceived patients requesting abortion as more ‘challenging ‘and ‘problematic’ than other patients, partly because of the...emotional investment which is associated with the role.
Staff’s sense of isolation was manifested because they felt they couldn’t talk to others about their job...
Unpopular Work
Dr. Astbury-Ward's PowerPoint also noted:
You need to look at the whole picture[;] this is not just a woman with a pregnancy inside her uterus that you need to empty. It’s the whole social, psychological aspect of an unplanned pregnancy. It’s all part of the complex picture.
In her paper, she added:
Although staff said personal opinions did not have a place in the delivery of care some were unable to disassociate themselves professionally from their own deeply held personal convictions.
In addition, some said that they felt unable to voice opposition to an expectation that they would work in this area if it was included as part of a wider women’s health remit...
Negative Emotions about Repeat Abortions
Dr. Edna Astbury-Ward's PowerPoint slide entitled "Repeat Abortions" contained these quotes, seemingly from abortion staff:
“I don’t think anybody likes it when we see women coming in again”
“oh second one”
“another one within a year”
“oh dear what is she doing”?
“silly girl”.
She additionally wrote in her paper:
The subject of repeat abortion provoked particularly negative staff emotions for personal and professional reasons, especially if patients repeatedly accessed abortion services because of non use of contraception.
Often staff admitted they wanted to ‘lecture’ patients about the issue and some implied that eventually patients may be less likely to receive good care in these instances.
However staff reported that women who requested abortion for foetal abnormality were likely to receive more sympathy, understanding and care.
"In 2008, 50% of all abortion patients reported having one or more prior abortions, a proportion that has remained stable since 1993," according to a 2018 published report. "The majority of abortion patients was using contraception at the time of conception, including those obtaining second- and higher-order abortions."
And this fact, among others, regardless of how much abortion workers say they support the act of abortion, still seems to make them uncomfortable with the killing.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Nancy Flanders
·
Investigative
Bridget Sielicki
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Investigative
Sheena Rodriguez
·
Investigative
Cassy Cooke
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Abortion Pill
Carole Novielli
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Abortion Pill
Carole Novielli
·
Investigative·By Carole Novielli
'Dirty work': How abortion industry workers really feel about their jobs
For decades, abortionists and abortion workers have noted the negative feelings and views associated with their chosen profession. Despite the best efforts of abortion advocates to "de-stigmatize" the act of abortion, which intentionally ends the life of a human being in the womb, the stigma and negative feelings associated with such an act rightfully persist.
Over the decades, little has changed regarding how abortion workers view their professions. They have referred to it as "dirty work," have stated they feel "ostracized" and isolated, say they are not respected and/or are stigmatized, and more.
Many express having difficulties with dealing with the direct killing and/or disposal of the remains of aborted children.
Many also express disdain toward women who come for repeat abortions and who choose not to use contraception to prevent pregnancy.
In a 1978 paper entitled, "What Abortion Counselors Want from Their Clients," Carole Joffe described abortion work as “dirty work," writing in part:
Dirty work... has several components: it can be physically repellent, symbolically degrading, morally dubious, and yet, under certain conditions... Abortion counseling encompasses all these aspects of dirty work.
The physically trying parts of the job involve confrontation with blood, vomit, and, in some instances, discernible fetal parts.
A certain symbolic degradation occurs with the counselor's responsibility for the post-abortion cleanup, which includes disposing of the "products of conception."
In 1993, the late pro-life strategist, Mark Crutcher sent an undercover survey to 961 U.S. abortion providers and then published the results in a report called Project Choice. Those results showed:
69% of the nation’s abortion providers say they are not respected in the medical community.
65% feel ostracized...
Almost 1 in 5 has been denied hospital privileges...
64% say that performing abortion causes a negative impact on the non-abortion part of their practice.
60% say that their prestige as a physician is damaged...
38% express moral misgivings about the abortion procedure.
Staffers have described dismemberment (D&E) abortions as evoking moral qualms, feelings that the procedure is "horrible," “emotional distress,” and “nightmares.”
In 2013, late-term abortionist Susan Robinson admitted:
'Being an abortion provider is very stigmatized. Other doctors look down on you and think of you as like the lowest of the low.'
Abortion staff have long been conflicted surrounding abortion, with some OBGYN residents stating in a 2015 report:
If my first task as a physician is to do no harm, how can I justify harming a fetus?
Seeing the fetus on an ultrasound scan and then watching it as we did the procedure really shook me to the core.
A paper published in 2022, "Providers’ experiences with abortion care: A scoping review," found:
... [P]roviders discussed the challenge of disclosing their work... and... noted that they do not feel comfortable talking about their work at home as their partners think that abortion is “distasteful”... that some family members or friends would never speak to them again if they knew about their work....
... [M]any described the challenge in deciding whether to share their involvement in abortion care... that disclosing their work could damage existing friendships....
... [M]any said that they were morally challenged by certain aspects of care. These included experiences with the fetus, differences between surgical and medical methods, providing care for cases that are medically indicated versus those that are not, and select cases where providers believed that abortion is being used as a method of contraception.
The paper also described abortion workers' feelings about being faced with the death of innocent preborn children:
Many discussed how contact with the fetal remains is a difficult aspect of care. Midwives in Japan noted sadness, confusion, and guilt when handling the remains, while nurses in the UK described the experience as “undignified”, “horrible”, and “like a bereavement”.
Increasing gestational age at the time of abortion was also a significant challenge.
Authors cited a U.S. provider, who said:
"You always see the pictures that anti-choice people protest with mangled fetuses and stuff. I had never really connected that to our work, so I was like, ‘wow, this actually is, at that point, a little fetus.’ Which is surprising to me, but it didn’t change the way I feel about abortion at all...."
Staff burnout, ambivalence, and nightmares have also been cited among U.S. abortion staff.
Live Action News recently discovered the existence of another source reinforcing the existence of abortion workers' negative emotions.
A publicly available PowerPoint uploaded by FIAPAC.org, a group founded in 1997 that holds international conferences on abortion, discusses 'Repeat abortion provoked negative emotions' among abortion facility staffers. The presentation's author also claimed that abortion workers experience judgmental opinions, a "sense of isolation," and negative views about their chosen profession.
The presentation, entitled "Abortion Care Research: The Staff Perspective," was presented by Dr. Edna Astbury-Ward, who was the "Visiting Research Fellow Institute of Health, Medical Science and Society Social Inclusion Research Unit Glynd ŵr University Wrexham."
The author presented her findings as part of a paper at the 9th Conference of the International Federation of Professional Abortion and Contraception Associates (FIAPAC) in October of 2010 in Seville, Spain. The findings were included on the FIAPAC website and were also documented in a separately published paper. Dr. Astbury-Ward's conference attendance, according to her presentation, was "sponsored by Marie Stopes International [MSI]" (now MSI Reproductive Choices, due to the group's efforts to distance itself from its eugenic history). The UK-based abortion provider claims to now work in 36 countries across six continents.
The PowerPoint presentation noted that the author conducted "in depth semi-structured face to face interviews... with 8 staff who provided care for women before, during and after abortion." The staff worked at "a variety of settings such as community contraception clinics, gynaecology wards and abortion assessment clinics."
Though this is a very small number of participants, the findings reinforced what abortion workers have been saying for decades.

The presentation noted "emotional challenges" of the job, including "[p]ersonal opinions compromised, [r]epeat abortions, [f]oetal abnormality." According to the presentation:
Staff were motivated by a desire to provide care for women in need.
Abortion care work was challenging at times.
Isolation was experienced as part of the job.
Repeat abortion provoked negative emotions.
Foetal abnormality commanded greater sympathy.
Inequitable access to abortion compromised care.
Evidence of some judgemental [sic] opinions.
Dr. Astbury-Ward found that, like in the U.S., working in abortion elsewhere is an "considered... an unpopular job" and that abortion workers experience "isolation," "fear," and "vulnerability":
Working in abortion care presented a unique set of social, emotional and practical challenges for staff...some staff expressed a sense of isolation from other colleagues.
They said that those who didn’t work in abortion care considered it an unpopular job and perceived patients requesting abortion as more ‘challenging ‘and ‘problematic’ than other patients, partly because of the...emotional investment which is associated with the role.
Staff’s sense of isolation was manifested because they felt they couldn’t talk to others about their job...
Unpopular Work
Dr. Astbury-Ward's PowerPoint also noted:
You need to look at the whole picture[;] this is not just a woman with a pregnancy inside her uterus that you need to empty. It’s the whole social, psychological aspect of an unplanned pregnancy. It’s all part of the complex picture.
In her paper, she added:
Although staff said personal opinions did not have a place in the delivery of care some were unable to disassociate themselves professionally from their own deeply held personal convictions.
In addition, some said that they felt unable to voice opposition to an expectation that they would work in this area if it was included as part of a wider women’s health remit...
Negative Emotions about Repeat Abortions
Dr. Edna Astbury-Ward's PowerPoint slide entitled "Repeat Abortions" contained these quotes, seemingly from abortion staff:
“I don’t think anybody likes it when we see women coming in again”
“oh second one”
“another one within a year”
“oh dear what is she doing”?
“silly girl”.
She additionally wrote in her paper:
The subject of repeat abortion provoked particularly negative staff emotions for personal and professional reasons, especially if patients repeatedly accessed abortion services because of non use of contraception.
Often staff admitted they wanted to ‘lecture’ patients about the issue and some implied that eventually patients may be less likely to receive good care in these instances.
However staff reported that women who requested abortion for foetal abnormality were likely to receive more sympathy, understanding and care.
"In 2008, 50% of all abortion patients reported having one or more prior abortions, a proportion that has remained stable since 1993," according to a 2018 published report. "The majority of abortion patients was using contraception at the time of conception, including those obtaining second- and higher-order abortions."
And this fact, among others, regardless of how much abortion workers say they support the act of abortion, still seems to make them uncomfortable with the killing.
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Our work is possible because of our donors. Please consider giving to further our work of changing hearts and minds on issues of life and human dignity.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Nancy Flanders
·
Investigative
Bridget Sielicki
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Investigative
Sheena Rodriguez
·
Investigative
Cassy Cooke
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Abortion Pill
Carole Novielli
·
Investigative
Carole Novielli
·
Abortion Pill
Carole Novielli
·