Skip to main content
Live Action LogoLive Action
abortion, congress

Congress to consider permanently banning taxpayer funding for abortion this week

IssuesIssues·By Cassy Cooke

Congress to consider permanently banning taxpayer funding for abortion this week

This week, Congress will begin discussing H.R. 7, the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion and Abortion Insurance Full Disclosure Act of 2017. This bill would effectively make the Hyde Amendment permanent. A similar bill passed the House in 2015, but failed to pass the Senate.

The bill would ban federal funding of abortions, as well federal funding for health benefits plans that cover abortions. It would also ban federal facilities and federal employees from providing abortions. Nothing in the bill would prevent non-federal organizations from providing funding or coverage for abortion.

During the presidential campaign, Donald Trump vowed to end taxpayer funding of abortion by making the Hyde Amendment permanent. The Hyde Amendment is a provisional rider that has been added to an appropriations bill every year since 1976. With this move, banning taxpayer funding for abortion would be its own, permanent, law. And while Democrats went the opposite direction — putting the overturning of Hyde into their official platform — they were opposed by pro-life party members. Planned Parenthood has also lobbied to have Hyde overturned.

The truth is, Americans favor ending taxpayer funding for abortion, including the majority of low-income Americans. Altogether, roughly 7 out of 10 Americans do not want taxpayer dollars going towards abortion, so this bill is clearly something that the people want.

While this bill is a good step forward, it does not completely ban all federal funding for abortion; there are exceptions in cases of rape or incest, and if the life of the mother is in danger. The problem with these exceptions is that they do not make abortion acceptable in any way. A child who is conceived in incest did nothing wrong and does not deserve a death sentence because of her parents’ mistakes; the answer to healing from rape is not more violence. Live Action President Lila Rose addressed this very issue in a debate on CNN with NARAL President Ilyse Hogue:

Thumbnail for Lila Rose and Ilyse Hogue debate abortion on CNN Crossfire

The other exception, that abortion can be federally funded if the life of the mother is at risk, is a popular talking point — particularly from pro-abortion activists — but the reality is, abortion is never medically necessary to save a mother’s life. Over 1,000 medical experts testified to this fact, as did Dr. Anthony Levatino, a former abortionist, in the following video:

Thumbnail for A Conversation with a Former Abortionist: Is abortion ever medically necessary?

Live Action President Lila Rose released a statement praising Congress and the Trump administration for making pro-life legislation a priority:

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextLONDON, ENGLAND - MARCH 29: J.K. Rowling arrives at the "Fantastic Beasts: The Secret of Dumbledore" world premiere at The Royal Festival Hall on March 29, 2022 in London, England.
Pop Culture

J.K. Rowling: 'I used to believe in assisted dying. I no longer do.'

Nancy Flanders

·

Spotlight Articles