We are urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly supporters) before the end of October to help save babies from abortion 365 days a year. Your first gift as a Life Defender today will be DOUBLED. Click here to make your monthly commitment.
CA pregnancy centers ask appeals court to restore their freedom of speech
Attorneys representing several California pregnancy resource centers (PRCs) were in court last week, urging the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to stop the state from censoring the PRCs from offering information about abortion pill reversal (APR).
Key Takeaways:
In 2023, California Attorney General Rob Bonta attempted to censor the state's pregnancy resource centers by prohibiting them from offering 'abortion pill reversal' information.
Last week, attorneys representing some of the centers were in court, asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to reverse Bonta's order.
The attorneys argued that the order violates the First Amendment right to free speech.
The Background:
In 2023, California Attorney General Rob Bonta sued several PRCs in the state, stating that they can’t provide clients with information about ‘abortion pill reversal’ because of Bonta's misinformed belief that APR information is “misleading.”
Following Bonta's lawsuit, several PRCs in the state filed countersuits, arguing that Bonta's attempt at censorship violates the First Amendment right to free speech. A federal district court later sided with Bonta and denied a petition to halt the PRC censorship, saying that the PRCs did not have the protected right to free speech because their speech was "commercial."
The Details:
Now, both Thomas More Society (TMS) and Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), on behalf of several California PRCs, have asked the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene. In a hearing held on October 9, the attorneys argued that the speech was not "commercial" because the PRCs did not stand to gain anything financially from women seeking abortion pill reversal.
“There is never an out-of-pocket payment by a woman,”Peter Breen, head of litigation of Thomas More Society, explained to the three-judge panel.
“Women deserve options, not censorship,” Breen further stated in a press release. “Countless women every year regret starting and completing a chemical abortion. The Abortion Pill Reversal protocol offers them hope, but instead of supporting their second chance at choosing life, the State of California wants to keep these mothers in the dark and force them into completing an abortion they no longer want.”
“This case is about free speech, a woman’s right to access life-saving information when it is needed most, and the government’s blatant attempts to censor viewpoints it disfavors,” he further added.
Dear Reader,
Every day in America, more than 2,800 preborn babies lose their lives to abortion.
That number should break our hearts and move us to action.
Ending this tragedy requires daily commitment from people like you who refuse to stay silent.
Millions read Live Action News each month — imagine the impact if each of us took a stand for life 365 days a year.
Right now, we’re urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly donors) to join us before the end of October. And thanks to a generous $250,000 matching grant, your first monthly gift will be DOUBLED to help save lives and build a culture that protects the preborn.
Will you become one of the 500 today? Click here now to become a Live Action Life Defender and have your first gift doubled.
Together, we can end abortion and create a future where every child is cherished and every mother is supported.
Abortion pill reversal is a process that uses high doses of progesterone to counteract the negative effects of the abortion pill drug mifepristone. A woman can undergo the protocol if she experiences regret soon after taking mifepristone. It has an effectiveness rate of 64% to 68% according to a 2018 peer-reviewed study. As of November 2024, more than 6,000 lives have reportedly been saved using the protocol.
“Abortion pill reversal is a lawful and lifesaving treatment. It occurs only after a conversation and informed consent from a licensed medical professional,” Caleb Dalton, senior counsel with ADF, told the panel of judges during the hearing. “The attorney general is attempting to censor information about that so that conversation never happens.”
Go Deeper:
Live Action News has covered many stories regarding abortion pill reversal's effectiveness, including success stories from women and families that have directly benefited from the protocol. Read more here:
Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!
Abortion Pill·By Bridget Sielicki
