
A growing number of Americans call themselves ‘pro-choice’ – but what’s really behind it?
Nancy Flanders
·
Wyoming Supreme Court declines to rule on state’s preborn protections law
The Wyoming Supreme Court issued a ruling last week in which it declined to take up a lawsuit challenging the state’s law protecting preborn children from abortion. The court’s decision sends the case back to a district court and keeps abortion legal in the state for now.
The state’s law protects most preborn children from abortion, restricting all abortions except in cases of rape or incest or for medical emergencies (though abortion is never medically necessary). However, the law had been on hold — and abortions in the state continued — after District Court Judge Melissa Owens issued a preliminary injunction against the law in August. That injunction followed a lawsuit from a pro-abortion coalition that argued that the law violates the state constitution.
“The statute restricts a woman’s right to make their own health care decisions during pregnancy and discriminates against women on the basis of their sex,” wrote Owens in her August ruling. “The statute dilutes the rights available to women in making decisions regarding their health care and whether or not to give birth to a child.”
Dear Reader,
Have you ever wanted to share the miracle of human development with little ones? Live Action is proud to present the "Baby Olivia" board book, which presents the content of Live Action's "Baby Olivia" fetal development video in a fun, new format. It's perfect for helping little minds understand the complex and beautiful process of human development in the womb.
Receive our brand new Baby Olivia board book when you give a one-time gift of $30 or more (or begin a new monthly gift of $15 or more) to fuel Live Action’s life-saving content.
In November, Owens ordered that the lawsuit be advanced to the state Supreme Court so that the court could consider 12 questions related to the law’s constitutionality. Ten of the questions asked the court to determine if the law violated provisions of the state constitution, while the other two asked the court to decide if the law violated citizens’ right to privacy, and whether it was constitutionally vague.
“After a careful review of the Certification Order, this Court finds it should decline to answer the certified questions,” the justices stated in a notice filed on December 20. “This Court does not believe it can answer all twelve certified questions on the limited factual record provided.”
Though the Supreme Court declined to determine at this time whether or not the preborn protection law violates the state’s constitution, there is the possibility that it may hear the case in the future. According to Cowboy State Daily, the district court will likely have a trial to determine the law’s constitutionality, but either party could appeal after that ruling.

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.
Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.
Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Nancy Flanders
·
Politics
Mark Wiltz
·
Issues
Angeline Tan
·
Issues
Angeline Tan
·
Issues
Cassy Cooke
·
Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·
Abortion Pill
Bridget Sielicki
·
Politics
Bridget Sielicki
·
Human Interest
Bridget Sielicki
·
Human Interest
Bridget Sielicki
·
Issues
Bridget Sielicki
·