Skip to main content

We are urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly supporters) before the end of October to help save babies from abortion 365 days a year. Your first gift as a Life Defender today will be DOUBLED. Click here to make your monthly commitment.

Live Action LogoLive Action
protester

Four biggest hypocrisies of the abortion movement

Icon of a magnifying glassAnalysis·By Xavier Meadows

Four biggest hypocrisies of the abortion movement

When considering the nature of abortion, it shouldn’t be a surprise that the institution is saturated with hypocrisies. Here are four of the biggest hypocrisies of the abortion movement..

1.) Your opinion only matters if you’re pro-abortion.

The message to women who advocate life is clear: shut up. If they don’t shut up, they should be prepared to pay the price. The vitriol hurled at pro-life women is astounding. To endure such venomous speech has become a type of initiation for pro-life, female public figures. Mia Love received pictures of aborted fetuses, and Live Action’s very own Lila Rose has gotten her fair share as well. Bill Maher found it appropriate to refer to Sarah Palin’s child as “retarded“, and David Letterman made a crass sexual joke about her then 14-year old daughter.

How about men? They need to stay out of “women’s issues.” “No uterus? No opinion!”

If that’s the case, can we have female politicians stay out of “men’s issues”? Also, I don’t hear many pro-aborts complaining about the Roe v. Wade decision, which was made by men. NARAL has no problem propping up pro-abortion men. I get it: men are allowed to voice their opinions only if they support abortion.

Irrespective of gender (and race, ethnicity, faith etc.), we are one nation, one people whose destinies remain intertwined. That means everyone gets an opinion.

2.) Science only matters when it’s convenient.

Dear Reader,

Every day in America, more than 2,800 preborn babies lose their lives to abortion.

That number should break our hearts and move us to action.

Ending this tragedy requires daily commitment from people like you who refuse to stay silent.

Millions read Live Action News each month — imagine the impact if each of us took a stand for life 365 days a year.

Right now, we’re urgently seeking 500 new Life Defenders (monthly donors) to join us before the end of October. And thanks to a generous $250,000 matching grant, your first monthly gift will be DOUBLED to help save lives and build a culture that protects the preborn.

Will you become one of the 500 today? Click here now to become a Live Action Life Defender and have your first gift doubled.

Together, we can end abortion and create a future where every child is cherished and every mother is supported.

Sometimes, a dream becomes a nightmare. Scientific advancements haven’t done pro-abortionists any favors. Ultrasound technology reveals both the humanity and rapid development of the pre-born. Abortion supporters must now resort to pieces titled “So what if abortion ends a life?”.

Another strategy employed by pro-aborts is to ignore the science altogether. Debbie Wasserman Schultz ignores the question of whether her children were human before birth. If she says “yes,” she confesses to supporting murder. If she says “no,” she blatantly disregards science.

3.) Animals get love, but not humans.

There’s nothing wrong with loving animals. Animals are beautiful creatures and deserve to be treated with respect. Normally, I don’t use the word “deserve” as it denotes entitlement. Here, the word “deserve” is appropriate. Animals possess an intrinsic value which entitles them to compassion, dignity, and respect among other things.

I hate to break it to abortion supporters (actually, no I don’t), but the intrinsic value of a human is greater than that of an animal. Just when you thought it was impossible, our culture sank to a new low when the media covered Cecil the Lion more than it did the trafficking of babies’ body parts. The same abortion supporters, who demand Cecil’s hunter’s head on a silver platter, don’t bat an eyelid at babies surviving abortions only to be murdered later.

4.) It’s okay to discriminate pre-birth, but not later.

Abortion advocates view themselves as pioneers of social justice and equality. The institution of abortion itself proves this view to be false. Racism? Gender discrimination? Special needs discrimination? Check check check. Abortion is arguably the most discriminatory institution in existence. You won’t hear a peep from abortion supporters about this or about Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood’s eugenicist founder.

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective.

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

Guest Articles: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated (see our Open License Agreement). Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

Read Next

Read NextPedestrians cross a street near a billboard with a poster with the lettering reading 'Where are these children?' in Warsaw, on August 5, 2022. - The billboards, put up in recent weeks by a Catholic foundation, are hard to miss: large and plastered all over Poland, they show two little blonde girls in immaculate white posing in a wheat field -- along with the alarmist caption, "Where are these children?" Falling birth rate statistics displayed alongside in the form of a pictogram claim that the average Polish family had five children in the 1950s, down to three in the 80s and 1.5 today.
International

Poland implements income tax incentives for families

Bridget Sielicki

·

Spotlight Articles