Guest Column

West Virginia abortion business drops lawsuit challenging abortion regulations

Northern Ireland, abortion

(Alliance Defending Freedom) A West Virginia abortion facility told a federal district court Monday that it is dropping its lawsuit challenging the state’s health and safety regulations designed to protect unborn lives and women’s health.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, assisted by attorneys from Alliance Defending Freedom, has been defending the law, asking the court to leave abortion policy in the hands of the state’s elected representatives.

“As West Virginia’s first pro-life attorney general, I stand firm in the belief that it is our duty to protect innocent life. We need to save as many innocent babies’ lives as legally possible,” Morrisey said. “I am proud to stand for the most vulnerable of our society and the sanctity of life. My office stands ready to defend this clearly constitutional law to the fullest should this lawsuit be refiled, or against any other legal challenge.”

“West Virginia has a strong and compelling interest in protecting unborn life, and maternal health and safety. This baseless challenge to the state’s pro-life laws never should have been brought in the first place,” added ADF Senior Counsel Denise Harle, director of the ADF Center for Life. “Abortionists who file lawsuits of this sort frequently do so because they would rather make a profit off of vulnerable women rather than see them have the real health care and resources they need, but that effort here faced serious problems because West Virginia’s law is on solid legal ground.”

Walgreens CVS banner

In 2022, after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, West Virginia largely replaced its previous pro-life law with the Unborn Child Protection Act, protecting unborn life from abortion in most circumstances. In this case, Women’s Health Center of West Virginia v. Sheth, the abortion facility and one of its abortionists challenged two of the state’s health-and-safety regulations: one that requires surgical abortions to be performed in a hospital, and another that requires an abortion to be performed by a licensed medical professional who has West Virginia hospital privileges.

Morrisey and ADF attorneys explained to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, Charleston Division, that West Virginia’s legal statutes are specifically designed to protect women’s health, and that “even under Roe and Casey, an abortion provider had no constitutional right to perform an abortion using his or her preferred methods.”

In a still-ongoing separate case, ADF attorneys are serving as co-counsel alongside Morrisey to defend the state’s pro-life laws from a legal challenge brought by an abortion drug manufacturer.

Editor’s Note: This article was originally published at Alliance Defending Freedom and is reprinted here with permission. 

Did you know that as little as $10 a month is enough to reach more than 3,000 people with the truth about abortion that no one else is telling them? Click here to start saving lives 365 days a year.

What is Live Action News?

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective. Learn More

Contact for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

GUEST ARTICLES: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated. (See here for Open License Agreement.) Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

To Top