The CDC reports: in 2012, the abortion industry killed 699,202 unborn Americans, down 17% from 848,163 in 2003. The abortion ratio fell by 14% from 24.1 per 100 live births to 21, and the abortion rate fell from 16 per 1,000 women of childbearing age to just 13.2, a drop of 18%. The CDC’s long-term data shows that abortion has declined by more than half since its peak in the late 1980s of more than 1.5 million per year.

Abortion proponents and pro-life advocates disagree completely about the decline, which is going on worldwide. The Guttmacher Institute, a research organization long affiliated with Planned Parenthood, credits the decline to the promotion of contraception and sex education. “When we look at where contraceptives became more available, it matches where the abortion rate falls,” Gilda Sedgh, senior research associate at Guttmacher, told LifeSiteNews.

According to Guttmacher’s 2009 report, “Abortion Worldwide: A decade of Uneven Progress,” the abortion rate worldwide fell from 35 per 1,000 women year in 1988 to 26 in 2008. In what Guttmacher terms the more developed countries, abortions dropped from 39 to 23 per 1,000 women, while in underdeveloped nations, abortions fell from 34 to 27.

As well, Sedgh claims that Guttmacher’s own research shows comparable abortion rates in countries with or without restrictions, which she claims is proof that illegalization of abortion does not reduce its incidence (though it would seem to prove the opposite just as much, or nothing at all). In a 2014 study on its own 2011 data, Guttmacher attributed America’s declining numbers to decreased sexual activity by teenagers as well as to contraception.

But conservative commentator and political scientist Michael New says the American data shows a strong correlation between the decline and states with restrictions on abortion, such as requirements for parental consent for minors or for women seeking abortion to be shown an ultrasound image of their unborn children.

Guttmacher counters that the decline in abortion up to 2008 is concentrated in states without abortion restrictions. But New says this is an apples-and-oranges argument, because the chief unrestricted states showing decline are California and New York, which are also the most populous.

Another academic, Dr. Priscilla Coleman, noted in her published rebuttal of Guttmacher’s claims that the states with the steepest decline were in the Midwest and had the most restrictions – Kansas, down 35%, and South Dakota, down 30%.

“Kansas had abortion laws requiring pre-abortion counselling and use of ultrasound, parental consent for minors, limited access to chemical abortion, limited abortion coverage in private insurance plans, amended abortion reporting laws, including mandated reporting of abortions performed on minors, close regulation of providers, limited abortion beyond 20 weeks, and banned partial-birth abortion,” she wrote.

“South Dakota required pre-abortion counselling, including warning women that abortion significantly increases their risk of depression and suicide, required use of ultrasound, and limited access to chemical abortion,” added Coleman, the author of a large body of research linking abortion to mental illness.  In other words, Guttmacher’s own data, properly understood, proves the opposite of what it claims: that restrictions produce reductions.

The Pro-Life Action League’s Scheidler told LifeSiteNews that a “massive surge in pro-life legislation has had a major impact” on abortion numbers. He added, however, that the CDC’s numbers were always hundreds of thousands of abortions below the actual numbers because California does not report its own abortion statistics.

“But the numbers are certainly down, and we also have to credit the increase in pro-life activities around abortion clinics from groups such as 40 Days for Life, and the increased visibility of abortion victim photography,” Scheidler added.

Editor’s Note: This was originally published at LifeSite News, and is reprinted here with permission.

Get the biggest pro life stories directly in your inbox. Breaking news, investigations, and stories you won't want to miss.

The CDC reports: in 2012, the abortion industry killed 699,202 unborn Americans, down 17% from 848,163 in 2003. The abortion ratio fell by 14% from 24.1 per 100 live births to 21, and the abortion rate fell from 16 per 1,000 women of childbearing age to just 13.2, a drop of 18%. The CDC’s long-term data shows that abortion has declined by more than half since its peak in the late 1980s of more than 1.5 million per year.

Abortion proponents and pro-life advocates disagree completely about the decline, which is going on worldwide. The Guttmacher Institute, a research organization long affiliated with Planned Parenthood, credits the decline to the promotion of contraception and sex education. “When we look at where contraceptives became more available, it matches where the abortion rate falls,” Gilda Sedgh, senior research associate at Guttmacher, told LifeSiteNews.

According to Guttmacher’s 2009 report, “Abortion Worldwide: A decade of Uneven Progress,” the abortion rate worldwide fell from 35 per 1,000 women year in 1988 to 26 in 2008. In what Guttmacher terms the more developed countries, abortions dropped from 39 to 23 per 1,000 women, while in underdeveloped nations, abortions fell from 34 to 27.

As well, Sedgh claims that Guttmacher’s own research shows comparable abortion rates in countries with or without restrictions, which she claims is proof that illegalization of abortion does not reduce its incidence (though it would seem to prove the opposite just as much, or nothing at all). In a 2014 study on its own 2011 data, Guttmacher attributed America’s declining numbers to decreased sexual activity by teenagers as well as to contraception.

But conservative commentator and political scientist Michael New says the American data shows a strong correlation between the decline and states with restrictions on abortion, such as requirements for parental consent for minors or for women seeking abortion to be shown an ultrasound image of their unborn children.

Guttmacher counters that the decline in abortion up to 2008 is concentrated in states without abortion restrictions. But New says this is an apples-and-oranges argument, because the chief unrestricted states showing decline are California and New York, which are also the most populous.

Another academic, Dr. Priscilla Coleman, noted in her published rebuttal of Guttmacher’s claims that the states with the steepest decline were in the Midwest and had the most restrictions – Kansas, down 35%, and South Dakota, down 30%.

“Kansas had abortion laws requiring pre-abortion counselling and use of ultrasound, parental consent for minors, limited access to chemical abortion, limited abortion coverage in private insurance plans, amended abortion reporting laws, including mandated reporting of abortions performed on minors, close regulation of providers, limited abortion beyond 20 weeks, and banned partial-birth abortion,” she wrote.

“South Dakota required pre-abortion counselling, including warning women that abortion significantly increases their risk of depression and suicide, required use of ultrasound, and limited access to chemical abortion,” added Coleman, the author of a large body of research linking abortion to mental illness.  In other words, Guttmacher’s own data, properly understood, proves the opposite of what it claims: that restrictions produce reductions.

The Pro-Life Action League’s Scheidler told LifeSiteNews that a “massive surge in pro-life legislation has had a major impact” on abortion numbers. He added, however, that the CDC’s numbers were always hundreds of thousands of abortions below the actual numbers because California does not report its own abortion statistics.

“But the numbers are certainly down, and we also have to credit the increase in pro-life activities around abortion clinics from groups such as 40 Days for Life, and the increased visibility of abortion victim photography,” Scheidler added.

Editor’s Note: This was originally published at LifeSite News, and is reprinted here with permission.