North Dakota Supreme Court orders judge to reconsider block on abortion law

India, North Dakota, pregnant, adoption, abortion pill, abortion pill reversal

A North Dakota judge who blocked the state’s law protecting preborn children from abortion has been ordered to reconsider his decision by the state Supreme Court.

Judge Bruce Romanick blocked the state’s trigger law just one day before it was due to take effect, after siding with what was previously North Dakota’s only abortion facility. Red River Women’s Clinic filed a lawsuit contesting the law and then moved across state lines into Minnesota.

Despite the fact that Red River was no longer operating in North Dakota, Romanick still agreed that the law protecting preborn children from abortion would cause “significant harm” and could hurt medical providers and pregnant women in North Dakota if allowed to take effect. But the North Dakota Supreme Court evidently disagrees with this ruling, ordering Romanick to reconsider the abortion facility’s chances of success at contesting the trigger law — something he refused to take into consideration in his previous ruling. He said this “would essentially have the court determine the final validity of the parties’ claims.”

READ: Jewish women sue, claiming pro-life law violates their religious freedom

Jonathan Turley, a professor at George Washington University Law School, told ABC News that the state Supreme Court ruling was to be expected, regardless of the subject matter: abortion. “This is entirely, if not embarrassingly, predictable,” Turley said. “Judge Romanick’s opinion was notably disconnected from the governing standard on preliminary injunctions. It was strikingly improvisational and the Supreme Court is ordering the court to return to the more scripted standard for such applications.”

Meetra Mehdizadeh, an attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, still argued that Romanick made the right decision, despite not keeping to the legal standard. “North Dakotans undoubtedly deserve the ability to make personal decisions about their own bodies and lives, and providers should not be afraid to do their jobs in caring for their patients,” she said.

Romanick previously prevented the trigger law from taking effect in July as well, saying that Attorney General Drew Wrigley “prematurely attempted to execute” the trigger law before the official judgment overturning Roe v. Wade had been released.

What is Live Action News?

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective. Learn More

Contact for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

GUEST ARTICLES: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated. (See here for Open License Agreement.) Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!

To Top