Guest Column

Nebraska Supreme Court rejects Planned Parenthood request for preliminary hold on pro-life law

court, utah, abortion pill reversal, conscience protections, abortions, iowa, college

Editor’s Note: Read Live Action News’ background article on this appeal here.

(NRL News Today) On August 11, after hearing arguments from lawyers for Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and the Nebraska Attorney General’s Office, Lancaster County District Court Judge Lori Maret sided with the state.

Plaintiffs had requested that a preliminary injunction be placed on the “Let Them Grow Act” and the accompanying law protecting the unborn at 12-weeks and beyond with the exception of rape, incest, and life of the mother.

The final version of LB 574 that was signed into law in May immediately went into effect.

Erin Bamer reported “The Nebraska Supreme Court announced Wednesday that it overruled a request by Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, backed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Nebraska, for a temporary injunction that would have halted Legislative Bill 574 during the time the case was considered.”

The law “still could be blocked if the court sides with Planned Parenthood’s argument that LB 574 violates a provision of the Nebraska Constitution which states a bill shall contain no more than one subject,” according to Bamer. “The next court date has not been set yet.”

Background

Attorneys for Planned Parenthood of the Heartland had argued that when the “Preborn Child Protection Act” —Amendment 1568—was attached to the “Let Them Grow Act” —LB 574—on May 16, it violated the Nebraska Constitution’s requirement that legislation be confined to a single subject.

However, the Nebraska Attorney General’s Office maintained that LB 574 “firmly withstands” questions about its constitutionality because the two matters both deal with public health and welfare.

“Plaintiffs (Planned Parenthood) rely on case law that is often inapplicable, distinguishable, or plainly stands against its proffered outcome,” wrote the Attorney General’s office. According to reporter Paul Hammel, Attorney General Erik Fernit’s brief maintains it is “irrelevant how LB 574 got passed and that the court needs only to consider ‘the end result.’”

Responding to Judge Maret’s decision to upholds the state’s position, Gov. Jim Pillen said, “I am grateful for the court’s thorough decision.” He went to say, “I was proud to sign into law a measure that protects kids and defends the unborn, and I am pleased that it has been upheld. Thank you to the Attorney General and his litigation team for defending this important law.”

Nebraska Attorney General Mike Hilgers added, “We are thankful for the court’s thoughtful analysis and recognition of the Legislature’s prerogatives and processes. As a result of today’s order, LB 574 remains law in Nebraska.”

Richardson called Judge Maret’s decision a “devastating blow to Nebraskans’ fundamental right to make what should be private decisions between them and their doctors.”

Earlier this year, a bill to protect unborn children after the 6th week fell short by a single vote of overcoming a filibuster.

Editor’s Note: This article was published at NRL News Today and is reprinted here with permission.

What is Live Action News?

Live Action News is pro-life news and commentary from a pro-life perspective. Learn More

Contact editor@liveaction.org for questions, corrections, or if you are seeking permission to reprint any Live Action News content.

GUEST ARTICLES: To submit a guest article to Live Action News, email editor@liveaction.org with an attached Word document of 800-1000 words. Please also attach any photos relevant to your submission if applicable. If your submission is accepted for publication, you will be notified within three weeks. Guest articles are not compensated. (See here for Open License Agreement.) Thank you for your interest in Live Action News!



To Top